AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kathryn Voltmer

MATH247 · MATH232 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderTest-heavy gradingHeavy homeworkPoor guidanceAvoid if possible
  • Students overwhelmingly , and little guidance.
  • Grades depend heavily on exams that many students .
  • Online reviews are especially harsh about workload, response quality, and self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even when some students earn A grades, reviews describe tough , and major self-teaching.

Online reviews are harsher about homework and guidance, while and poorly aligned tests.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Some content may be straightforward for prepared students, but most reviews describe fast, difficult math with .

Online students report the course feels like self-teaching, while main difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly establish an , though late work is described as strict.

, but both formats mention limited flexibility around work and support.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend her because , and high-stakes tests.

Both online and especially consistent and detailed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough grader and .

Format shift

Online and , though online reviews provide more repeated examples.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

and is paired with test-heavy grading, especially in online MATH232.

Format shift

Online , while in-person reviews focus more on tests and grading.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Most students say lectures provide little guidance, responses are unhelpful, and learning depends on outside resources.

Format shift

Online reviews are consistently severe, while but remain mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

91/100

Reviews repeatedly state that while homework and .

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed only once, but , and little feedback.

Main concern

as high-stakes, poorly aligned, and difficult to prepare for.

What students said

“ !!!!!!! every test is about 23 percent of your grade”
MATH232
“ like she expects you to already know what to do)”
MATH232
“Nice person and the notes were good and easy to understand and review, just difficult content.”
MATH247

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online , and exams that dominate the grade.

Main concern

Students say they must teach themselves while and .

What students said

“ ; have to watch many times, thoroughly read beginning of chapters, and even use Youtube to get the concepts.”
MATH232
“No guidance, lectures are completely useless.”
MATH232
“This professor once assigned 180(lots of multi-part-questions) homework questions due in 3 days.”
MATH232

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules, but , and harshly graded exams.

Test HeavyHigh-Stakes ExamsUnclear Test QuestionsMisaligned Review MaterialLittle Exam Feedback

Assessment risk

Strict

16/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring, but they describe high-stakes tests that do not match review material.

Test HeavyMisaligned Review MaterialNo Exam FeedbackHigh-Stakes Exams
“ ”
MATH247
“every test is about 23 percent of your grade”
MATH232
“she'll have you study a review for the test and put 1 thing from the review on the test”
MATH232

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules, but .

Test HeavyHigh-Stakes ExamsUnclear Test QuestionsLittle Guidance
“ .”
MATH232
“Does not make good quizzes or .”
MATH232
“ and exams.”
MATH232

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are not super confident with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and ; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“No guidance, lectures are completely useless.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

5/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“This professor once assigned 180(lots of multi-part-questions) homework questions due in 3 days.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ; have to watch many times, thoroughly read beginning of chapters, and even use Youtube to get the concepts.
  • like she expects you to already know what to do)
  • No guidance, lectures are completely useless.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Got a B on one of the unit exams and it dropped my grade 6%.
  • Never before have I failed a class until I signed up for hers.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • .
  • Does not make good quizzes or .
  • and actual exam content

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across online and , and strongly negative.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH23210 reviews
MATH2473 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1