AI Rate Professor

English

Paul Portuges

ENG201C · ENG210A · ENG99201A · ENG156 · ENGL231 · ENG99 · ENGL201A · ENGL201C · ENG201A · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
81.25%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take Portuges if you want a and , but expect more writing online.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveStrong writing feedbackDiscussion-driven classesOften easy gradingReading and papers vary by format
  • Students most often praise Portuges for , and .
  • In-person reviews describe a much easier workload than the online and papers.
  • Grades are usually attainable, but students uncomfortable with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very realistic because , though online students report more writing work.

, while online reviews still show high grades but and reading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course content is accessible and discussion-based, but current-event topics and writing volume keep it from being effortless.

In-person courses are described as easier and lighter, while online courses feel more extensive and writing-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

and worksheets, but reviews suggest missing some classes is usually manageable.

Attendance flexibility is supported mainly by in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend him because , and .

, but online reviews include more workload complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Students often describe him as easy or fair, with rewrites and .

Format shift

, while online reviews still show many A grades despite heavier work.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Workload ranges from very light in and papers in online ENG201A.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews often mention only a few essays or minimal assignments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students , and ability to make English discussions meaningful.

Format shift

Teaching praise appears in both formats, though online students are more divided because of workload.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades , and response questions rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments, with and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews describe an engaging, discussion-heavy class with , and a caring professor.

Main concern

Some students dislike his controversial discussion style or feel he can challenge opposing views too sharply.

What students said

“There is a good amount of work, but if you don't procrastinate, it isn't difficult to get done.”
ENG201A
“Only 3 papers and the rest of the . Easy A”
ENG201A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews and care, but several call the workload heavy with and papers.

Main concern

The online version and writing than students expect.

What students said

“There was a lot of reading and writing so be prepared for that.”
ENG201A
“He just assigns way too much work compared to other English 201A classes.”
ENG201A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, with one online review saying the midterm and final were somewhat hard and .

Midterm And Final MentionedFew Tests In Some In-Person ReviewsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring.

Tests Not ManyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Tests? Not many”
ENG201C
“Only 3 papers and the rest of the .”
ENG201A

Online

Online reviews only clearly mention that the midterm and or open-book policy.

Midterm And Final MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring
“ , but not too bad.”
ENG201A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The ! and has no problem answering any questions you might have.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He gave the and truly helped my writing and grammar skills.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ !!!!! This guy is awesome.”

⚖️

84/100

“He isn't a and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Everything you learn is super interesting and not like any normal english class.
  • Loved his class. Rich and varied discussions and topics.
  • Makes you think deeply about controversial topics and encourages debate in a respectful way.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Grades

  • He just assigns way too much work compared to other English 201A classes.
  • Only 3 papers and the rest of the . Easy A
  • He will let you re write them for a better grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He cares about the well being of his students and doesnt overload at all.
  • , and wants every student to succeed in his class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 29 reviews across many years, with , and format-based workload differences.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG201A15 reviews
ENG1563 reviews
ENG201C2 reviews
ENG210A2 reviews
ENGL201A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENGL201C2 reviews
ENG991 review
ENG99201A1 review
ENGL2311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 4 · A 6

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1