AI Rate Professor

Biological Sciences

Michele Roest

BIO211 · BIO222 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a structured, not-too-hard biology class and can handle a potentially blunt or unpleasant teaching style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy contentStructured classCondescending toneFast lecturesMixed helpfulness
  • Students usually describe the content as manageable or easy.
  • The main complaint is interpersonal tone, with several reviews calling her rude, condescending, or unpleasant.
  • Older positive and helpful, but recent reviews are more critical.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Grades seem attainable because students call the content easy or not too hard, though .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students describe the course content as easy or fine, with the main , and teaching style.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance appears important because exams are tougher if you miss class and lectures move quickly, but .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on whether students value structure and manageable content more than warmth and interpersonal support.

because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

The class is described as structured and manageable, but if students miss class.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

Students mention some reading and homework, but the workload is not described as heavy.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

because some students found her helpful, while several recent reviews describe her as rude or condescending.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with recent comments more negative than older ones.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and lecture content without enough detail to show one dominant method.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All evidence is in person and shows an academically manageable course with inconsistent teaching tone and helpfulness.

Main concern

Several students report rude or condescending interactions.

What students said

“The class itself wasn't too hard.”
BIO222
“I found the professor to be rude and condescending to all students.”
BIO222
“Very helpful! Very kind!”
BIO211

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly support standard exams with some toughness tied to .

Tough Exams If AbsentPowerPoint Essay Questions

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

if students miss class and , but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Tough Exams If AbsentPowerPoint Essay Questions
“Beware the if you miss class”
BIO222
“On the and then whizzes through the informational slides.”
BIO211

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class itself wasn't too hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in course ease, structure, tone, and helpfulness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“The class was fine in its content but I found the professor to be rude and condescending to all students.”

📘 Course Easiness

70/100

“Her class is pretty easy but she is NOT pleasant or helpful.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

55/100

“Overall a decent class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was a good teacher, a bit condescending in a way but overall easy content.
  • She seems to be very burnt our on teaching and .
  • and helpful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Structure

  • The class itself wasn't too hard.
  • There was a bit of reading and but it was super structured which I really appreciated.
  • Beware the if you miss class

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • If .
  • Very helpful! Very kind!
  • she was honestly really disrespectful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

, and several are old, but the recent comments consistently flag tone issues.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO2114 reviews
BIO2223 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values