AI Rate Professor

English

Courtney Brogno

ENGLC · ENG227 · ENG201C · ENGL56 · ENG156 · ENGLI1A · ENG201A · ENGL145 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you only need credits and can handle a chaotic, self-directed writing course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedPoor FeedbackEasy AFrequent CancellationsHeavy Writing
  • Many students , and canceled classes.
  • Grades can be easy for strong writers, but the learning experience is often poor.
  • Recent reviews are much more negative than older reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students report easy A grades or free credits, but strong writing and tolerance for disorganization still matter.

Easy A , while online reviews sound harder and more frustrating.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The writing content is not described as conceptually hard, but and chaotic structure make it feel harder.

In-person reviews often call the class easy but chaotic, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

because classes are often canceled or off-topic, though some and attendance expectations appear.

In-person reviews discuss cancellations and , while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most recent students strongly advise avoiding her because of , and .

Both formats are negative, with and in-person reviews focused on cancellations and lack of teaching.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and several call it an easy or free A.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in in-person reviews, while online students more often describe harsh or .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students mention , and sudden deadlines even when grades can be easy.

Format shift

Online reviews mention many assignments and , while , and last-minute deadlines.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Recent reviews repeatedly describe poor , and little actual teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize Canvas and communication, while , and lack of structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews , and projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly , and low instructional value, despite some easy grades.

Main concern

Students often felt they had to teach themselves while dealing with .

What students said

“Not once did she actually *teach* anything.”
ENG201A
“Super easy class, Free A if you put in 20% effort.”
ENG201A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe , and poor communication.

Main concern

Students struggled with disorganization and .

What students said

“By far she is the ”
ENG201A
“the calendar for assigned and your grades will be wrong/won't get updated”
ENG201A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenAssignment-Heavy Course

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the exam format or requirements.

Final MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Wrote 3 essays and a ”
ENG201A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the most frustrating course I have ever taken. Easy A, tho.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and reliability. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Not once did she actually *teach* anything.”

📈 Grade Value

82/100

“Super easy class, Free A if you put in 20% effort.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

18/100

“By far one of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not once did she actually *teach* anything.
  • Super disorganized and .
  • so vague and didn't provide any structure.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A, tho.
  • Super easy class, Free A if you put in 20% effort.
  • Some effort is required for a decent grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Reliability

  • She cancelled more than half of our classes, sometimes with no notice
  • She took forever to grade and I didn't know
  • when it is held there is no value in showing up

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 31 reviews across many years, with especially consistent recent complaints about organization and feedback.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENG201A14 reviews
ENG201C6 reviews
ENG1563 reviews
ENGLC3 reviews
ENGL1452 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ENG2271 review
ENGL561 review
ENGLI1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 4

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4