AI Rate Professor

Music

Cassandra Tarantino

MUS220 · MUS235 · MUSIC220 · LRCN3102 · MUS228 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take her for an encouraging music class with strong recent easy-A evidence, while .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEncouraging teacherFun classEasy ARetakeable quizzesMixed older feedback
  • Recent online reviews describe an enjoyable and very grade-friendly Music Appreciation class.
  • , and fun teaching style.
  • , so the format evidence is positive but not perfectly consistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

and there is no reason not to get an A.

Online reviews give clear easy-A evidence, while but .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students describe the course as enjoyable, beginner-friendly, and low difficulty, though some music activities may be harder to follow.

, while in-person evidence is mostly positive but includes one older negative voice-class review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Most students recommend her for , and grade-friendly despite one severe older complaint.

Online reviews are clearly positive, while negative outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

because quizzes can be retaken, and reported grades are mostly A or A+.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest grading evidence, while but .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The work is easy but includes many short quizzes, creating volume without much difficulty.

Format shift

Online reviews mention over 150 short quizzes, while .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students praise her as encouraging, fun, and supportive, but one older review describes a very negative classroom experience.

Format shift

Online reviews are positive and recent, while but include one severe older criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

The clearest assessment evidence is many short Norton coursebook quizzes rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews do not clearly describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Most in-person students describe her as , and inspiring, but one older review strongly criticizes her behavior.

Main concern

One older student reports embarrassment, volatility, and poor fit for college-level teaching.

What students said

“Cassie is a wonderful person and an encouraging teacher.”
MUS228
“She treats students like 5 year olds and seems to derive pleasure from embarrassing people.”
MUS220

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students find the class enjoyable, clear, and very easy to earn an A in because .

Main concern

The online course uses over 150 short quizzes, so the workload is repetitive even if easy.

What students said

“No reason to not get an A on this course.”
MUS235
“Grading consists of over 150 short quizzes.”
MUS235

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment appears student-friendly because the clearest evidence is retakeable short quizzes, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

Retakeable QuizzesMany Short QuizzesCoursebook Grading

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, book policy, proctoring, midterms, or finals.

Online

Online reviews describe over 150 short quizzes that can be retaken to improve the grade, but do not clearly .

Retakeable QuizzesMany Short QuizzesCoursebook Grading
“Grading consists of over 150 short quizzes.”
MUS235
“ and .”
MUS235

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No reason to not get an A on this course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Cassie is a wonderful person and an encouraging teacher.”

📈 Easy A Evidence

93/100

“ and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ ...”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures were a treat, with special guests playing music and talking about the classical music world.
  • I love how involved she is with the students and i could connect.
  • She is very nice, at times her playing on the piano.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No reason to not get an A on this course.
  • Grading consists of over 150 short quizzes.
  • and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Feel

  • Cassie is a wonderful person and an encouraging teacher.
  • She is very encouraging and supportive even outside of class.
  • She treats students like 5 year olds and seems to derive pleasure from embarrassing people.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across formats provide useful evidence, but several are old and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MUS2282 reviews
MUS2352 reviews
LRCN31021 review
MUS2201 review
MUSIC2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values