AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Jennifer Hubbard

CIS120 · CIS201 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
69.23%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend consistently, ask for help early, and tolerate a programming class that can feel demanding online.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful when engagedParticipation heavyMixed teaching experienceTough gradingProgramming fundamentals
  • Students who attend and do weekly work often earn strong grades.
  • Online reviews are sharply mixed, with both strong support and serious frustration.
  • In-person reviews describe the class as much easier and more approachable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A is realistic for students who attend, participate, and , but several online students say it is not an easy A.

Online evidence points to fair but effort-heavy grades, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The programming content is manageable with practice, but beginners may struggle with assignments and pace.

Online reviews make the course sound more challenging, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly treated as important for passing and earning a good grade.

Both formats emphasize showing up, especially live online classes and in-person activities.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Many students recommend her for support and , but .

, while online reviews are split between high praise and strong dissatisfaction.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

44/100

Grades can be good, but and high effort prevent calling it lenient.

Format shift

Online students mention tough grading more often, while .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and practice matter, with some online students reporting very heavy time demands.

Format shift

Online workload is heavier and less predictable, while as low to moderate.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

She is often described as helpful, caring, and clear, but some students report feeling unsupported or disrespected.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback is mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and at least one final test, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

and a , while in-person reviews emphasize class activities and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and describe the class as approachable, practical, and easy with attendance.

Main concern

Students still need to show up and complete in-class work.

What students said

“Easy, easy class.”
CIS201
“If you're new to programming shes good.”
CIS201
“ and approachable.”
CIS201

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students report a wide range of and tough grading.

Main concern

The online version can demand steady weekly work and may feel harsh for beginners.

What students said

“If you do the homework and participate a little in class, you're looking at an A or B.”
CIS201
“I spent about 15-20 hours per week solely focusing on this class, and barely scrapped by with a mid B.”
CIS201
“ .”
CIS201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, with one online review criticizing final test timing and .

Final Test MentionedHomework And ParticipationReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Online

Online reviews mention a final test with too little time, but do not clearly .

Final Test Timing ConcernNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“I literally was given ”
CIS120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do the homework and participate a little in class, you're looking at an A or B.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“It's not an easy A unless you do the work.”

⚠️ Online Risk

44/100

“If you can, pick someone else.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • after and talk about any problems that you have.
  • and approachable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you attend the weekly classes you will more than likely come out with a high grade.
  • I spent about 15-20 hours per week solely focusing on this class, and barely scrapped by with a mid B.
  • Easy A if you do all that

Theme 3

🧭

  • If you attend the live class, you'll do just fine.
  • If you don't do the work each week, future weeks are too hard to understand.
  • Just show up to all classes and save EVERY in class activity and exercise you do onto your USB drive.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several years give consistent themes, though online opinions are polarized.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CIS20112 reviews
CIS1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 9 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values