AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Frank Ha

SOC206 · SOC202 · SOC101 · SOC201A · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him if and can handle reading-heavy sociology work, but if boring lectures or tricky exams will derail you.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLenient late workReading-heavy modulesExtra credit and curvesBoring lectures for someStudy-guide dependent exams
  • Students often praise his flexibility, , curves, and willingness to work with life conflicts.
  • The online class can be reading-heavy with , and papers.
  • Teaching quality is polarized because while others find lectures dull or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students earned A grades through , and flexible late work, though some say the reading and .

In-person reviews more often call him an easy A, while online reviews show A grades are common but and weekly tasks.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Sociology content is often described as straightforward and accessible, but and .

as easy or boring, while online content feels heavier because and writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

84/100

Several students say lectures or because notes, slides, and course materials are posted online.

In-person reviews explicitly say attendance is optional, while online and late work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

, and , but not for students who need lively lectures or low workload.

Online recommendations depend on tolerance for reading-heavy modules, while in-person recommendations are sharply split between easy-A praise and boring-lecture complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Students repeatedly mention late-work acceptance, , curves, resubmissions, and study guides that make high grades reachable.

Format shift

Both formats show leniency, with online late work especially flexible and and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Some in-person sections are light, but many online reviews describe lots of , and papers.

Format shift

Online workload is heavier and more structured, while .

Teaching experience

Average

61/100

Students praise his kindness and discussions, but many describe lectures as boring, monotone, or too dependent on slides and reading.

Format shift

Online teaching is seen as organized but less interactive, while in-person teaching is and dull lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment mixes exams, quizzes, discussions, essays, papers, assignments, and , with .

Format shift

Online sections lean toward weekly quizzes, discussions, and essays, while and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews range from easy and highly recommended to boring and and study guides.

Main concern

The main in-person concern is dull lectures and occasional complaints that .

What students said

“super easy class and an even easier A.”
SOC201A
“The worse lecturer ever had. so tough.”
SOC201A
“Showing up for , but you will need to study the notes he gives you online.”
SOC201A

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe organized but work-heavy modules with lots of , and flexible late policies.

Main concern

The main online concern is the amount of reading and weekly written work.

What students said

“You could turn in .”
SOC201A
“The class was too much work.”
SOC201A
“There's a .”
SOC202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed but generally standard-to-friendly because , and offset some tough or proctored tests.

Study GuidesCurved ExamsExtra CreditProctored TestsNo Midterm Or Final In One Online Section

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

slides, and five-test structures, but do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Study GuidesCurved ExamsFive TestsPosted Slides
“ but ..”
SOC201A
“ and gives out study guides for all 5 tests.”
SOC201A
“Study guides are issued for , Easy A.”
SOC201A

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, timed essays, one report of proctored tests, and one section with , but do not prove webcam or Lockdown Browser rules.

Proctored TestsOpen Book Notes QuizzesTimed EssaysNo Midterm Or Final In One Section
“Proctored tests, but .”
SOC201A
“We had weekly discussion posts, open and can prepare), and papers.”
SOC201A
“ .”
SOC202

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof Ha is probably the . He wants you to get the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching style. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

86/100

“He accepted all assignments that had been turned in late with no consequences.”

📚 Workload Balance

48/100

“Professor Ha is a good professor. However, his class was A LOT of work.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

61/100

“Professor Ha has good class discussions. Class felt collaborative.”

Theme 1

⚖️ About Grades & Policies

  • Lots of .
  • You could turn in .
  • super easy class and an even easier A.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There was a lot to read at times, but I honestly found the topics to be very interesting.
  • Weekly/bi-weekly modules are due that include a , and quiz.
  • as long as a chapter.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He kept things interesting.
  • The class was totally boring and useless lectures every day.
  • His lectures and class discussions are interesting, and he is funny.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 47 reviews cover both online and in-person sections with , and lecture style.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 512
3 out of 57
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

SOC201A38 reviews
SOC2024 reviews
SOC2063 reviews
304281 review
SOC1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 2 · A 16 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values