AI Rate Professor

Library Science

Carina Love

LIBT104 · LIBT217 · LIBT201 · LIBT204 · LIB217 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid her online classes unless you can tolerate heavy , and a poor effort-to-credit ratio.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming workloadTricky quizzesSlow feedbackHarsh gradingOutdated material
  • Online students overwhelmingly describe the one-unit courses as and difficult.
  • Many reviews complain , and outdated or confusing materials.
  • The but still notes slow responses and high difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments , and major papers are required.

Online evidence shows very high effort for grades, while the single .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students describe the courses as , and harder than their credit value suggests.

Online reviews strongly show difficult course experience, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews , though online courses require steady quizzes, readings, discussions, and assignments.

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly discourage taking her because the , and teaching quality feel unreasonable.

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, while the but too limited to offset them.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly , and delayed feedback on important work.

Format shift

Harsh grading evidence is almost entirely from online reviews; the .

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Students say one-unit online courses took more time than three- or four-unit classes because of , and assignments.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is severe, while the overload.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most online students describe confusing teaching, outdated materials, slow responses, and a need for a complete course revamp.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strongly negative, while the but still notes slow responses.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Assessment appears quiz- and , though discussions and assignments also matter.

Format shift

, and a final paper; in-person reviews do not clearly describe assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The lone in-person review is positive about course depth but and the class is very detailed.

Main concern

Slow responses and very detailed material may frustrate students needing support.

What students said

“She is very slow to respond to questions which is my only complaint.”
LIBT104

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are strongly negative, focusing on excessive workload, confusing or , and .

Main concern

The workload and as extreme for low-credit courses.

What students said

“This 1 unit class took more time than any 4 unit class.”
LIBT217
“ assigned readings.”
LIB217

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support high exam and quiz risk through tricky quizzes, test-heavy structure, a , and a heavily weighted final paper, but .

Tricky QuizzesTest HeavyFinal ExamFinal Paper

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format, proctoring, open-book rules, or final format.

Online

Online reviews repeatedly mention tricky quizzes, tough tests, a , and a , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Tricky QuizzesTest HeavyFinal ExamFinal Paper
“Quiz and she is smarter than we are.”
LIBT217
“final exam is like 80 questions all from quizzes and a .”
LIBT217

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class needs a complete revamp and new teacher. Avoid.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ way the class was taught.”

📚 Workload Warning

5/100

“This 1 unit class took more time than any 4 unit class.”

⚠️

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • This was the hardest 1 credit class I have ever taken.
  • Course was way too time intensive and difficult given that it was a 1 unit class.
  • It takes more time that 3 & 4 unit classes!

Theme 2

📝

  • , as though she's being graded on how many students she can trick.
  • .
  • assigned readings.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫

  • Her lectures are all several years old and haven't been updated.
  • .
  • It's not very effective when an .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews spanning many years are detailed and highly consistent, especially for online courses, though .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

LIBT2175 reviews
LIB2172 reviews
LIBT1042 reviews
LIBT2011 review
LIBT2041 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values