AI Rate Professor

History

Bree Highouse

HIS203A · HIST204B · HIST203A · HIST204A · HISTORY203B · HIST207B · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are comfortable with papers and can handle inconsistent organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate lecturerDisorganized gradingPaper heavyMixed clarityApproachable when engaged
  • for passion and clarity but repeated complaints about disorganization.
  • The online review is very negative and , and questionable quiz content.
  • Grades can be manageable, but papers and inconsistent teaching quality make the experience unpredictable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but students often mention papers, reading, and inconsistent .

The online review earned an A but describes high friction, while and heavy paper demands.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The history content is , but disorganization and off-topic teaching can make it harder than expected.

The online review suggests unclear course delivery, while and confusing instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but the reviews do not clearly prove a strict mandatory policy.

In-person comments emphasize paying attention in class, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and passionate, but several strongly warn against her due to clarity and .

The online evidence is negative, while and strong avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Some students call her an easy or fair grader, but and .

Format shift

In-person reviews contain both easy-grader and tough-grader evidence, while the online review .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple reviews , and reading.

Format shift

Heavy workload is mainly supported by in-person reviews, while the .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Her teaching ranges from passionate and , and disorganized.

Format shift

The single online review is poor, while positives and strong negatives.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a , so assessment is mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment details, while the , and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

severe complaints about disorganization, papers, and unclear expectations.

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent structure and a .

What students said

“Her class is so easy if you read and pay attention during her lectures.”
HIST204B
“Her lectures were so bad.”
HIST203A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review describes poor , and unsupported quiz material.

Main concern

Students and weak feedback independently.

What students said

“Her assignments lack proper instructions, and she does not grade quickly or .”
HIST207B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, and papers, but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring policies.

QuizzesTestsMidterm PaperFinal Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention straightforward tests, two tests, a , and a evidence.

Straightforward TestsTwo TestsMidterm PaperFinal Paper
“her tests are straightforward and .”
HIST204B
“We only take 2 tests.”
HIST203A

Online

The online review mentions quizzes and tests but does not .

QuizzesTests
“She included information on quizzes that was not in the textbook or given material.”
HIST207B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Highouse was awesome. She's passionate about her subject, and she did a great job of and fascinating.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is a .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“One thing to bear in mind, she does have you write a lot of papers.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

50/100

“ , and never graded things on time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She did a great job of and fascinating.
  • Her lectures were so bad.
  • She's passionate, knowledgable, and approachable.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload & Grades

  • She does have you write a lot of papers.
  • .
  • the tests and and graded fairly.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Her assignments lack proper instructions, and she does not grade quickly or .
  • , and never graded things on time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across many years provide useful but inconsistent evidence, with only one online review.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HIST207B3 reviews
HIST204A2 reviews
HIS203A1 review
HIST203A1 review
HIST204B1 review
Show 1 more courses
HISTORY203B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values