AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Sebastian Ferrada

ETHN219 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if possible, but online students , and limited communication.

Best fit · Effort For RewardVery lenient deadlinesExtra credit availableSlow gradingHeavy reading onlineLow instructor presence online
  • In-person reviews are warm and strongly positive, while online reviews are split and often frustrated.
  • Grades are usually high, but online and not knowing where they stand.
  • The course content is generally manageable, but reading and weekly modules can feel heavy online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

High grades, grace periods, and make an A realistic, but .

, while online evidence shows high grades with frustrating feedback delays.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students usually describe the content as manageable if they keep up with readings and modules.

, while in-person reviews describe the class as interesting and manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation appears to matter in some sections.

Neither online nor in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

but hesitate online because of poor grading speed and communication.

, while online reviews are sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, grace periods, and many A-range grades suggest .

Format shift

, while online grades are high but .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is manageable for organized students but and weekly modules can pile up.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reading and modules more often, while as manageable.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Ferrada is praised as kind and engaging in person but criticized online for being absent and unresponsive.

Format shift

Teaching experience appears much stronger in person than online.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and assignments more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly discuss .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are highly positive, emphasizing kindness, grace periods, , and manageable workload.

Main concern

Evidence is limited because .

What students said

“Such a nice and understanding professor.”
ETHN219
“gave a 5 day grace period for assignments and a lotttt of !”
ETHN219

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe easy-to-manage modules but serious problems with and absent communication.

Main concern

Students may not get timely grades or replies.

What students said

“course was easy but teacher takes forever to grade things and never answered emails”
210
“Failed to grade anything until the end of the semester.”
210
“just keep up with the modules and and .”
210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or .

Exam policy not clearly provenAssignment-focused evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final structure.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“course was easy but teacher takes forever to grade things and never answered emails”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Failed to grade anything until the end of the semester.”

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“gave a 5 day grace period for assignments and a lotttt of !”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Someone who clearly loves to teach.
  • Such a nice and understanding professor.
  • completely absent and not engaged with the class was off putting.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • About a chapter a week from a free online textbook with discussion posts.
  • just keep up with the modules and and .
  • Everyone had a hard time even being online with the amount of reading and the GRADING.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • teacher takes forever to grade things and never answered emails
  • Nothing was graded so you never know how well you're doing.
  • gave a 5 day grace period for assignments and a lotttt of !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews give useful format contrast, but the .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

2104 reviews
ETHN2192 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values