AI Rate Professor

Human Development

Caryn Coffman

NUT10 · NUTR10 · NUTR210 · HEALTH3 · NUT210 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Coffman is a good choice for students who want a manageable nutrition course and can tolerate dry lectures or occasional online confusion.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy A PotentialExtra CreditBoring LecturesClear GradingTough Tests
  • Many students say the course is easy or manageable, especially with study guides, assignments, and .
  • Teaching reviews are split between knowledgeable and technology.
  • Tests and projects can be harder than the general course difficulty suggests, so the A often requires steady work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Students often report A-level outcomes through assignments, study guides, and , but tests and .

Online reviews emphasize and easy assignments, while , and completing work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Nutrition content is often described as common sense or easy, though some tests and projects add challenge.

Online course content sounds easier overall, while and harder tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance rules are not consistently described, but and participating.

Online reviews do not focus on attendance, while well.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and informative course, but enthusiasm is reduced by boring lectures and online tech issues.

Online recommendations are more favorable overall, while because of lecture style.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and assignment points make grading more forgiving despite some hard tests.

Format shift

Online reviews mention more often, while in-person reviews , and assignment buffers.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

Several students call the class not time consuming, but projects and .

Format shift

Online workload is usually described as lighter, while and many assignments.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Coffman knows the material and can be helpful, but many students find her boring or .

Format shift

Online teaching is hurt by Canvas and wording complaints, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

57/100

, and several tests rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and projects, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe easy material and fair grade paths but repeatedly call lectures boring and .

Main concern

Lectures may feel dull, and .

What students said

“Do the work and you'll get your A.”
NUTR210
“ ; it is a lot of information.”
NUTR210
“Extremely boring with no personality.”
NUT210

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are mostly positive about ease, structure, and , but one recent and broken links.

Main concern

and technology problems can waste time.

What students said

“This class is easy with lots of possible.”
NUTR210
“I spend more time trying to figure out what she is asking than doing the actual work.”
NUTR210
“Good class, well structured and not time consuming”
NUT210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

difficult, with some student-friendly buffers like study guides and a .

Tests Can Be ToughStudy GuidesDropped Exam

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and dropping one test, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Five ExamsDrop One ExamStudy Guides
“there are 5 exams and .”
NUT10
“she gives study guides for test.”
NUTR10

Online

but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Tests Can Be Tough
“The , because it wouldnt be material we covered specifically”
NUTR210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the work and you'll get your A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy A Potential

80/100

“This class is easy with lots of possible.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She does know her stuff and .”

⚖️

76/100

“If you study, show up, and do the (easy) 15 point assignments, you will get the A you deserve.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was always pretty slow for me (Nutrition 210) but its not hard to get an A in.
  • Do the work and you'll get your A.
  • Very easy class if you do the study guides

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Coffman is amazing. I learned so much this semester.
  • Extremely boring with no personality.
  • She does know her stuff and .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • Good class, well structured and not time consuming
  • Easy notes and instructions for an online course.
  • I spend more time trying to figure out what she is asking than doing the actual work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews over many years give a consistent pattern of easy material, mixed teaching style, and manageable grades.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 57
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NUTR21011 reviews
NUT2103 reviews
NUTR102 reviews
705891 review
HEALTH31 review
Show 1 more courses
NUT101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values