AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Stacy Millich

CJ204 · CJ224 · CJ208 · CJ210 · CJ102 · CJ6 · CJ202 · CJ206 · CJ000 · CJ201 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
76.47%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take Stacy Millich if you want an and are willing to attend and participate.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEngaging lecturesCaring mentorReal-world experienceAttendance mattersLight homework
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Stacy Millich as engaging, caring, and inspiring.
  • The course is usually manageable, with and and attention.
  • A small minority report tough grading, attendance pressure, or poor online organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades are usually very reachable with , and basic studying, though a few students warn that missed work or .

In-person evidence drives this score because there are only two online reviews, and those online reviews .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students usually call the , and engaging, especially when they attend lectures and follow the notes.

In-person reviews provide most evidence for easy course content, while online reviews mainly support teaching quality.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and participation often matter for grades, and multiple reviews warn that skipping class can hurt performance.

and participation, while online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

because she makes Criminal Justice interesting, practical, and personally supportive.

Both online and in-person reviews are positive, but the recommendation strength .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Grading is generally fair with in some classes, but several students report tough grading, few graded items, or harsh late penalties.

Format shift

and tough-grader warnings, while online evidence is too limited for a strong grading conclusion.

Workload

Light

75/100

and manageable studying, with occasional complaints about time-consuming or test-heavy structure.

Format shift

, while online reviews do not establish workload clearly.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students repeatedly call her engaging, caring, knowledgeable, funny, and one of .

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, but quality and classroom energy.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear , and exams rather than relying on one method only.

Format shift

, and participation, while online assessment details are sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

experience, and personal support, with attendance and participation often important.

Main concern

The main concern is that some , and participation points.

What students said

“Her lectures were so engaging and fun.”
CJ206
“Attendance is also worth 100 points at the end of the semester.”
CJ202

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online evidence is limited but positive, with students praising her care, helpfulness, and ability to make class work online.

Main concern

The small number of online reviews limits confidence about online workload and .

What students said

“She made the boring stuff seem fun and adding her own experience into the lecture added a real-life twist!”
CJ208
“She really made the most out of class online during the pandemic and was so understanding and helpful.”
CJ202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests a standard quiz-and-test structure with Browser policies.

QuizzesMidterm and Final MentionedTests Reward AttendanceNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

63/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, with difficulty depending on attendance and studying.

QuizzesMidterm and Final MentionedTests Based on Lectures
“Her quizzes were simple and the but if you don't study, it could be the .”
CJ202
“Pay attention in class and and tests.”
CJ202

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or quiz structure.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mrs. Millich is THE BEST! She is the main reason why I am completing my degree in Criminal Justice.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Her lectures were so engaging and fun.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“Take her class if you have the !”

📌

28/100

“Attendance is also worth 100 points at the end of the semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made the boring stuff seem fun and adding her own experience into the lecture added a real-life twist!
  • Her lectures fly by!
  • , and the work is super easy.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She really cares about her students and will help at all times!
  • Professor Milich genuinely cares about your success.
  • Such an amazing teacher and an even better person.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Attendance

  • so light but make sure to do them because it does impact your grade.
  • Her class is easy if you participate and show up.
  • If you study, you will get an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 43 reviews over a long time span, with very consistent praise and a few specific negative exceptions.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CJ20222 reviews
CJ20610 reviews
CJ2083 reviews
CJ2042 reviews
CJ0001 review
Show 5 more courses
CJ1021 review
CJ2011 review
CJ2101 review
CJ2241 review
CJ61 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

11

B+ 3 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1