AI Rate Professor

Biological Sciences

Brent LaMon

PSYCH201A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can keep up independently and do not need deadline flexibility.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrict deadlinesLecture heavyMonotone teachingHeavy exam prepLow recommendation
  • Students describe the coursework as doable but .
  • Teaching is seen as dull and not very effective despite genuine interest in the subject.
  • Both reviews report a B outcome and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades appear achievable but not easy, with strict missed-work rules and extensive study demands.

Online evidence stresses unforgiving deadlines, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The subject is described as interesting and doable, but the study material is unusually extensive.

Online comments call the coursework doable, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Reviews , but the online course has very strict missed-assignment consequences.

Only the online review gives flexibility evidence; the policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because the class feels boring, strict, and unrewarding.

Both online and in-person reviews are negative, though for different reasons.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, but missed work is penalized and both reported grades are B.

Format shift

Online evidence suggests strict deadline grading, while .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is described as doable but .

Format shift

Online workload sounds manageable, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students say he is nice and interested in the subject, but his teaching is boring and ineffective.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is limited, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Comments mention quizzes, assignments, and large study guides, with .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions quizzes and assignments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review describes the class as lecture heavy, boring, and packed with .

Main concern

Monotone lectures and .

What students said

“Not the .”
PSYCH201A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says coursework is doable but .

Main concern

Strict handling of missed work creates risk for students with emergencies.

What students said

“If you miss an .”
PSYCH201A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and exams, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

QuizzesExtensive Study GuidesExam Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not clearly prove the .

Extensive Study GuidesExam Heavy
“The information to study for .”
PSYCH201A

Online

The but does not clearly prove the .

Dropped Quiz Scores
“ ”
PSYCH201A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Interesting subject, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, flexibility, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Not the .”

⚖️

30/100

“If you miss an .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a nice guy.
  • his voice is very monotone and boring.
  • Not the .

Theme 2

📚

  • While his coursework is doable
  • the study guides are like 6 pages long.
  • The information to study for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews across a long time span give limited but consistently negative evidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH201A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values