AI Rate Professor

History

Clarke Ronald

HIST203B · HIS203B · HIS207A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can manage heavy independent work and tolerate inconsistent support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy workloadMixed teaching qualityClear grading in one online classPoor communication concernsReading and test heavy
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with one strong in-person praise but multiple complaints about workload, organization, and accessibility.
  • Online reviews especially , and .
  • Getting an A can be , but the effort cost is high and inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible if students complete the work, but the workload can be intense and draining.

but also the strongest workload complaints, while in-person evidence is mixed.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course is challenging because students report , and .

Online reviews emphasize weekly workload and due-date confusion, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation through discussions and weekly work appears important.

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is weak because multiple students describe excessive workload, poor communication, and frustrating organization.

Online reviews are mostly negative, while and two poor experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One review says clear work leads to an A, but others describe difficulty and .

Format shift

but stressful in others, while in-person grading evidence is limited.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students report large weekly loads with reading, essays, discussions, quizzes, and test-heavy work.

Format shift

Online reviews show the strongest workload burden, while one in-person , and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

and fair to boring, unreachable, and .

Format shift

, while online evidence leans negative because of workload and organization issues.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and test-heavy tags, so assessment appears mixed with a test lean.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests, essays, discussions, and inquisitives, while , and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

teacher and complaints about boring lectures, poor availability, and too much work.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent help and lecture quality.

What students said

“He is very fair and if you have a problem he will work with you .”
HIS207A
“His lectures are super boring.”
HIS207A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing heavy weekly work, test-heavy structure, and an A is possible.

Main concern

The main concern is excessive workload and .

What students said

“Insane amount of work assigned every week.”
HIS203B
“Do the work and you'll get an A.”
HIST203B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or .

Test heavy mentionedQuiz format mentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove broader exam rules or closed-book requirements.

Weekly quiz
“2 page paper, essay, discussion board, and .”
HIS207A

Online

Online reviews mention test-heavy work and inquisitives but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or .

Test heavyInquisitives
“inquisitives take 2 hours each week as well.”
HIS203B
“ .”
HIS207A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Insane amount of work assigned every week.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in workload, teaching support, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Risk

18/100

“Insane amount of work assigned every week.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“His lectures are super boring.”

⚖️ Grade Path

52/100

“Do the work and you'll get an A.”

Theme 1

📈 About Workload And Difficulty

  • Insane amount of work assigned every week.
  • 2 page paper, essay, discussion board, and .
  • The inconsistent dates made this class very difficult!

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching And Support

  • He is very fair and if you have a problem he will work with you .
  • He doesn't answer emails, and if you ask for help he tells you to look at the syllabus.
  • the class moodle and frustrating at times.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across both formats provide useful but mixed evidence, with some missing grades and uneven detail.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HIS207A4 reviews
HIS203B1 review
HIST203B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values