AI Rate Professor

Engineering Technology

Eltahri Elghandour

ENG252 · ENGR250 · ENGR251 · ENGR252 · ENGR252A · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless , and treat older in-person praise as less reliable for the current experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching requiredPoor online supportHeavy workloadTest-heavy gradingOlder in-person praise
  • Recent online reviews are strongly negative and describe little instruction, weak response time, and mismatched materials.
  • Older in-person reviews are much , and lenient grading.
  • The course can reward effort in some in-person sections, but recent students report heavy work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

, and lenient grading, but recent reviews describe heavy work, poor feedback, and high-stakes exams.

, while in-person evidence is mixed between older leniency and newer exam-heavy complaints.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Engineering content is demanding, and poor online instruction makes students rely heavily on self-teaching.

Online reviews describe the format as especially difficult, while with steady work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though online courses appear asynchronous and .

Online evidence suggests asynchronous access, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most recent students strongly discourage taking him because of weak instruction, poor communication, and heavy assessment pressure.

Online recommendations are strongly negative, while and mostly positive only in older reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

and , but recent reviews emphasize delayed grading, no keys, and large exam weights.

Format shift

Online grading sounds unclear and slow, while to harshly exam-heavy in recent ones.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly cite lots of homework, and and .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Recent students describe little teaching presence and poor communication, outweighing older praise for and care.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is very poor, while and newer negative ones.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and finals with large grade weights.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and test-heavy design, while in-person reviews mention finals worth 45% to 50%.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split, with older students praising him but newer students criticizing automated work, weak help, and high-stakes exams.

Main concern

The evidence is dated and inconsistent, with .

What students said

“Teaches well.”
ENGR250
“50% of your grade is based on 1 exam.”
ENGR250
“The class is a lot of work but its not hard if you do the work steadily.”
ENGR252

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students consistently describe poor teaching presence, slow or , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students say the online course lacks real instruction and support.

What students said

“the lecture videos posted aren't even his”
ENGR251
“ canvas discussion post”
ENG252
“I haven't seen or heard his voice the entire semester.”
ENGR250

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support a test-heavy structure with multiple-choice quizzes and very high final exam weight, but .

Multiple-Choice QuizzesNo Partial CreditHigh-Weight FinalTest-Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test-heavy grading, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

High-Weight FinalTest-Heavy
“45% is too much.”
ENGR251
“50% of your grade is based on 1 exam.”
ENGR250

Online

Online reviews mention multiple-choice quizzes with no partial credit and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Multiple-Choice QuizzesNo Partial CreditTest-Heavy
“ partial credit”
ENG252
“Test heavy”
ENGR250

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn it is completely on you, embarrassing to see a respected professor not do his job for an entire semester and still get praise.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“The class would be no different if there were no teacher.”

⚖️

38/100

“50% of your grade is based on 1 exam.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Didn't even teach the class, wont answer emails unless you hound him
  • Teaches well.
  • Hes friendly and .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • It's a lot of work and his videos suck.
  • The class is a lot of work but its not hard if you do the work steadily.
  • Get ready to read

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Exams

  • He needs to reduce the weight of the final as well. 45% is too much.
  • 50% of your grade is based on 1 exam.
  • BECAUSE HE GRADES EASIER THAN THE OTHER TEACHERS AND

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews span many years and formats, with consistent recent complaints but .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGR2505 reviews
ENGR2513 reviews
ENG2522 reviews
ENGR2522 reviews
ENGR252A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1