AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Alicia Hammond

PSYC201 · PSYCH201 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Avoid unless and learn with little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CourseUnhelpful CommunicationHeavy WorkloadMixed Online ExperienceLow Empathy
  • Most , and weak support.
  • but two strongly negative experiences.
  • Grades can still be high, but students describe the course cost as frustrating and unfair.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

High grades are possible, but the and heavy work make the A feel costly rather than easy.

Online evidence is mixed, while the and poor support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content itself does not sound highly advanced, but poor organization and .

Online problems center on confusing setup, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

because they describe disorganization, poor support, and low empathy.

Online reviews are mostly negative with one positive exception, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students earned A and A- grades, but comments .

Format shift

Both formats include high grades, but .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students describe lots of work, many links, and frustrating course demands.

Format shift

Online reviews mention excessive links and impossible directions, while the of work.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most comments describe unclear teaching, rude responses, poor organization, or lack of care.

Format shift

Online teaching is inconsistent, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The comments emphasize coursework, directions, links, textbook use, and .

Format shift

Both formats discuss work and course materials more than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and focuses on , and rude communication.

Main concern

The professor may not provide enough help for the workload.

What students said

“For the amount of work .”
PSYC201
“ and shes rude when you email her asking questions.”
PSYC201

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative because students describe confusing setup, poor responsiveness, and lack of .

Main concern

The and unsupported.

What students said

“What a mess.”
PSYC201
“She was creating the class as we worked on it.”
PSYC201
“I really enjoyed taking this class!”
PSYCH201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book status, or final structure.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For the amount of work .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“ and shes rude when you email her asking questions.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“She does not help, and doesnt care about you or your grade.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“Also, literally 30 links in the first week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and shes rude when you email her asking questions.
  • I really enjoyed taking this class!
  • her lectures are easy to listen to.

Theme 2

🧩 About Organization

  • What a mess.
  • She was creating the class as we worked on it.
  • I had to message her for misleading directions, typos etc. that literally made the course impossible.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Alicia failed to demonstrate any level of .
  • She does not help, and doesnt care about you or your grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews across online and with one positive outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYC2013 reviews
PSYCH2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1