AI Rate Professor

Film, Television & Electronics Media

Wendy Wagoner

FTVE221 · FTVE227 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take Wagoner for FTVE221 if you want an engaging, low-stress media course, but verify the term length before enrolling.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPassionate teacherEasy gradingInteresting materialFast feedbackOccasional workload mismatch
  • Most FTVE221 students describe the course as easy, interesting, and reasonably graded.
  • Online reviews are mostly very positive, but one short-term pacing issue caused a serious negative experience.
  • FTVE227 in person is more mixed because one student found it busy and harshly graded.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

FTVE221 looks like an easy A with and open-book quizzes, but FTVE227 and short-term pacing can raise the effort.

Online evidence is mostly easy and grade-friendly, while in-person evidence is easy for FTVE221 but mixed for FTVE227.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Most students describe the material as simple, interesting, and beginner-friendly, though some formats move quickly.

Online FTVE221 is clearly simple, while in-person FTVE227 appears more practice-heavy and less effortless.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and most comments focus on assignments and pacing instead.

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend her because , and fair, despite a few course-specific complaints.

Online reviews strongly recommend FTVE221, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, though one FTVE227 student reports harsh grading.

Format shift

Online grading is consistently described as fair or easy, while .

Workload

Light

76/100

FTVE221 often has a light workload, but short-term pacing and FTVE227 busy work prevent a featherlight score.

Format shift

Online workload is usually light except for one intensive pacing complaint, while in-person workload varies by course.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly describe her as passionate, kind, informative, and .

Format shift

Both formats show strong teaching praise, though one online review complains about course pacing rather than teaching quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and course modules without showing a pure exam focus.

Format shift

Online FTVE221 mentions quizzes and assignments, while , and busy work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are positive for FTVE221 but mixed for FTVE227, where workload and .

Main concern

FTVE227 may require more practice, writing, or prior comfort than students expect from a fun class.

What students said

“I was able to complete a whole week's module in about 90 minutes.”
FTVE221
“Lots of busy work.”
FTVE227
“ .”
FTVE227

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online FTVE221 is usually described as easy, interesting, and fairly graded, with one major complaint about unexpected short-term pacing.

Main concern

One student said the course became intensive because the .

What students said

“ , and has very interesting material.”
FTVE221
“ .”
FTVE221
“It was so intensive and way more than I signed up for that I barely failed”
FTVE221

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest exam evidence is open-book online quizzes and , with no proven strict proctoring.

Open Book QuizzesQuizzes And Exams From Lecture MaterialNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exam content comes from lecture information, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Lecture-Based Quizzes And ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The lectures are filled with good info, which is all obviously on the quizzes/exams.”
FTVE221

Online

but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Open Book QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ .”
FTVE221

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and has very interesting material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She is a wonderful teacher who is very kind and grades very reasonably.”

📈 Easy A Potential

86/100

“I was able to complete a whole week's module in about 90 minutes.”

⚖️

82/100

“Instructor is not a as long as you follow directions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You can tell she is very passionate about what she teaches
  • She grades really fast and .
  • I enjoyed her teaching style and plan on taking Ms. Wagoner again in the future.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • , and has very interesting material.
  • She is a .
  • .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload And Format

  • .
  • It was so intensive and way more than I signed up for that I barely failed
  • Lots of busy work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years give consistent evidence for FTVE221, though FTVE227 has fewer and more mixed comments.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FTVE2216 reviews
FTVE2272 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values