AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Suzanne Schepler

ACCT201B · ACCT201A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if available, but be cautious with because workload and tone may feel frustrating.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditQuick Email RepliesHeavy HomeworkHelpful OnlineIn-Person Friction
  • Online students describe an easy A with major and quick support.
  • and attitude when students ask questions.
  • The experience depends strongly on format, with online evidence .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The online class is called an easy A with lots of , but the in-person review warns that .

Online evidence supports an easy A, while payoff.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The accounting content sounds manageable when modules and homework are followed, but simple.

Online comments make the class sound easier, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

The online asynchronous section is flexible, while the .

Online evidence comes from an asynchronous class, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students split sharply, with one strong online recommendation and .

, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

83/100

and an A+ in the online review suggest generous grading, but the .

Format shift

Online evidence supports generosity, while .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Online work sounds manageable, but the feel overwhelming.

Format shift

Online workload sounds light to moderate, while .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is helpful and responsive online, but the .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

The online class uses homework plus two exams, while in-person evidence .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework, a midterm, and a final, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The because and the professor can seem impatient.

Main concern

and monotonous.

What students said

“There is a substantial amount of ”
ACCT201A
“I'd stay away.”
ACCT201A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The online asynchronous class is described as , and full of .

Main concern

The syllabus may be inaccurate, so students need to follow modules carefully.

What students said

“Took this class as asynchronous and it was an easy A.”
ACCT201B
“Sooooo much and and final).”
ACCT201B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention only a midterm and , webcam use, or proctoring.

MidtermFinalExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Online

The online review mentions two exams, a midterm and final, but .

MidtermFinal
“ and final)”
ACCT201B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Took this class as asynchronous and it was an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Schepler answers emails quickly as well and .”

📈 Grade Value

82/100

“Sooooo much and and final).”

⚠️ Workload Risk

45/100

“There is a substantial amount of ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Schepler answers emails quickly as well and .
  • I've noticed she tends to give students attitude sometimes whenever they ask questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Took this class as asynchronous and it was an easy A.
  • Do the homework and youll do great.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • There is a substantial amount of
  • It's just the McGraw-Hill style of so monotonous to me.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and the two formats give sharply different experiences.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT201A1 review
ACCT201B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values