AI Rate Professor

Speech Communication

C Swift

SPCH1A · COMM201A · COMM210 · SPEEC210 · SPCM210 · SPCH210 · SPCM215 · SPEECH1A · SPEE210 · COMM201 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can handle heavy participation, strict expectations, and a lot of writing for a speech class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy Busy WorkHard GraderParticipation RequiredUnclear AssignmentsMixed Kindness
  • Students repeatedly describe , and reading expectations.
  • Teaching reviews are polarized, with and clear while many older reviews call her rude or unclear.
  • Grades are possible with sustained work, but students looking for a light speech class are likely to be frustrated.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A good grade is possible, but reviews repeatedly , and learning her preferences.

Online requires active participation, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The speech content may be introductory, but assignments, papers, quizzes, and .

Online sounds demanding because of participation, while because of workload and grading.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Participation and as essential, with comments warning that .

Online participation is heavily monitored, and in-person tags and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendations are split, but the strongest pattern warns that the , and clarity issues outweigh her kindness for many students.

The one online review recommends her, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several students call her a , though some say she grades fairly and allows rewrites.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited, while .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students repeatedly mention , and busy work.

Format shift

Online workload is tied to participation effort, while as heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students find her sweet, clear, and understanding, but , and poor answers to questions.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, while and often negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessment appears to mix essays, presentations, journals, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes participation, while , and a midterm.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but often warn about , and rude interactions.

Main concern

The workload and class.

What students said

“ and more in addition to the three group presentations”
COMM210
“The amount of work that goes into it was beyond anyone's limit.”
SPCM210
“ !”
SPEEC210

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online class is kind and supportive but heavily monitors participation and does not allow minimal effort.

Main concern

Zoom participation is heavily monitored and showing up matters.

What students said

“class participation on zoom was heavily monitored”
COMM201
“she is not going to let you get by with the bare minimum”
COMM201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but includes hard quizzes and a , or open-book rules.

Hard QuizzesMidtermExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a midterm that many students failed, but do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring.

Hard QuizzesMidterm
“the ”
SPEEC210
“ !”
SPEEC210

Online

The online review does not clearly describe exams, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“So much work for a speech class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“very good teacher, answers questions clearly, grades fairly, and a really sweet person”

📚 Workload Load

20/100

“ and more in addition to the three group presentations”

⚖️

28/100

“she is a !”

👍 Recommendation Rate

38/100

“stay away from this teacher!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Swift is incredibly enjoyable and .
  • !
  • , and and upbeat.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • So much work for a speech class.
  • The amount of work that goes into it was beyond anyone's limit.
  • Just get ready for TONS of busy work,

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you're willing to work for an A or B, you'll do fine.
  • !
  • grades fairly

Theme 4

🗣️ About Participation

  • class participation on zoom was heavily monitored
  • you will be expected to show up and really try
  • as long as you're respectful/listen during lectures you will be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews span many years and give , and participation despite mixed views on personality.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

SPCM2103 reviews
COMM2102 reviews
SPCH2102 reviews
SPEEC2102 reviews
COMM2011 review
Show 5 more courses
COMM201A1 review
SPCH1A1 review
SPCM2151 review
SPEE2101 review
SPEECH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1