AI Rate Professor

Economics

E. Queenan

ECON201A · ECON201B · 201AONLINE · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Queenan can be a good grade play for independent online students, but if you need timely help or detailed instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy A potentialUnclear instructionsSlow responsesTextbook heavyMixed online experience
  • Recent online reviews describe an easy, structured path to an A if students read and meet deadlines.
  • Older and negative reviews repeatedly criticize vague instructions, poor communication, and slow responses.
  • In-person reviews are limited but also raise concerns about weak help and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A can be very reachable online by reading, following directions, using , and completing routine work, but support gaps add risk.

Online reviews provide strong easy-A evidence, while pattern.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The economics content is often normal or manageable, but and textbook dependence make it less beginner-friendly.

Online reviews , while in-person reviews mainly complain about communication rather than content.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Most evidence comes from online asynchronous work with deadlines, readings, quizzes, and .

Online reviews imply high attendance flexibility, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

, but many others warn against poor communication and vague instructions.

Online reviews are polarized, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Many online students earned A grades with , and clear deadlines in positive reviews.

Format shift

Lenient grading evidence is strongest online; .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The course , and homework, but positive reviews call it doable.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is detailed and mixed, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

, but many students report poor communication, vague instructions, and little help.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is polarized, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention , and a short final quiz.

Format shift

Online reviews provide most assessment detail, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and describe a nice professor but weak communication and limited help.

Main concern

.

What students said

“This teacher is an extremely bad communicator; as well as, very vague in her instructions.”
ECON201A
“She is .”
ECON201A

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are and frustrating courses with poor communication.

Main concern

Students who need instructor support may struggle with and vague directions.

What students said

“Easy A”
ECON201A
“ .”
ECON201A
“Instructions very vague!”
ECON201A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , and a short final quiz online, but proctoring and book rules are not clearly proven.

Untimed quizzesUnlimited retakesShort final quizPolicy not fully proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Online reviews explicitly , and a short final quiz, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Untimed quizzesUnlimited retakesShort final quizTests mentioned
“also untimed quizes.”
ECON201A
“ a short quiz.”
ECON201A
“Tests are 20 to 50 I believe. 2 midterm”
201AONLINE

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“AMAZING professor! Took her class this summer & it was so easy!”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online course structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She is a terrible communicator and this is an online class.”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“Manage time wisely & you'll get an A :)”

⚖️

74/100

“ a short quiz.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Communication

  • .
  • She never returned my emails in a timely manner and by the time she did, it would be too late.
  • This teacher is an extremely bad communicator; as well as, very vague in her instructions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • Very doable and not overwhelming at all.
  • You can't pass if

Theme 3

📚 About Course Structure

  • Class consists of Learn Smart textbook chapers, 2 podcasts& 2 discussions also untimed quizes.
  • and follow the deadlines.
  • The material was of normal difficulty, but and there was a lot of confusion.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 15 reviews cover multiple years and repeatedly show the and poor communication.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ECON201A10 reviews
201AONLINE3 reviews
ECON201B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1