AI Rate Professor

Behavioral Sciences

Anneka Pisula

BIO211 · BIO212 · BIO70899 · BIO201 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you can teach yourself difficult biology from the textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyFast lecturesTough gradingConfusing explanationsHeavy reading
  • Students repeatedly say tests are hard and poorly aligned with lectures.
  • Both online and .
  • Recommendation is extremely low, with every reviewer .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and low grades despite effort.

, while in-person reviews also report failure and severe frustration.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The biology content feels harder because , and heavily dependent on textbook reading.

Both formats describe fast lecture delivery, with online students adding that long sessions reduce retention.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person evidence says skipping class hurts, while online evidence focuses more .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students do not recommend her because , and the class damages grades.

Both online and in-person reviews are consistently negative, with no .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students report half the class failing tests and describe her as a .

Format shift

Online reviews strongly emphasize harsh testing, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The workload is heavy because reviews mention lots of , and demanding tests.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reading and long lectures, while and leaning heavily on the textbook.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students say , and does not help enough for a difficult subject.

Format shift

Online and in-person comments both criticize pace and clarity, though .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

The course appears strongly test-driven, with repeated complaints that exams determine outcomes and are hard to pass.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially test-focused, while and lecture-heavy preparation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are also , and very poor outcomes.

Main concern

Students say lectures move too fast and the class is painful or confusing.

What students said

“Lectures are too fast.”
BIO70899
“The .”
BIO212

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews , and technical issues with the testing program.

Main concern

as unfair, poorly supported, and technically frustrating.

What students said

“Half of the stuff on the ”
BIO212
“She talks very fast, full notes are hard.”
BIO201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as difficult, test-heavy, and often not well supported by lectures, but reviews .

Test HeavyPoor Lecture AlignmentTesting Program Issues

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and fast lecture preparation, but do not clearly prove the exam format or .

Test HeavyFast Lecture Preparation
“Half the class failed every single test.”
BIO212
“Lectures are too fast.”
BIO70899

Online

, and a testing program that works best on Macs, but do not clearly prove webcam, open-book, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyPoor Lecture AlignmentTesting Program Issues
“her testing program only works well with macs”
BIO211
“Half of the stuff on the ”
BIO212

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She is not great at explaining the material.”

🧪

18/100

“Half the class failed every single test.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ ”

Theme 1

🧪 About Tests

  • Half the class failed every single test.
  • Half of the stuff on the
  • The class testing score was below average because she stacked the test

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She talks very fast, full notes are hard.
  • Lectures are too fast.
  • articulation's a .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • The .
  • !!
  • I am on track to not graduate on time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has only 6 reviews, but the negative themes are detailed and highly consistent across formats.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BIO2123 reviews
BIO2011 review
BIO2111 review
BIO708991 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1