AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Sarah Guglielmo

HEED8 · HEED203 · HEALTH208 · HEED000 · HEED201 · HED2030 · WOMENSHEALTH · HEED208 · HEED3 · HEALTH · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Guglielmo if you want an engaging health class and , and steady assignments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeable teacherHelpful feedbackOpen-note testsGrading inconsistencyAttendance matters
  • Most students like Guglielmo for engaging lectures, support, and .
  • Getting an A is often realistic, but and .
  • , while online evidence is mixed with and pacing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is usually reachable with attendance, notes, and completed assignments, but .

Online reviews conflict on grading fairness, while with attendance and notes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The material is often described as basic or straightforward, though some versions feel fast-paced or oddly specific.

, while online evidence includes more complaints about pace and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Several students say attending class is important or required for doing well because assignments and test preparation happen in class.

In-person reviews strongly support attendance importance, while online reviews do not provide a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and makes health topics engaging.

, while online reviews are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but several students report unpredictable or .

Format shift

Online reviews show the most grading complaints, while but .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

, and tests, but many students find it manageable if done on time.

Format shift

In-person workload is steady and attendance-based, while online workload can feel harder or faster-paced.

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Students frequently describe her as knowledgeable, supportive, entertaining, and .

Format shift

, while online reviews show less consistent teaching presence.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to come from papers, homework, projects, presentations, in-class work, and tests.

Format shift

and group work, while online reviews emphasize research papers and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

as knowledgeable, helpful, and entertaining, with manageable work if students attend and .

Main concern

Students need to attend, keep good notes, and .

What students said

“Use of notebook for .”
HEALTH208
“Must attend class for A.”
HED2030

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between easy A praise and frustration with .

Main concern

The .

What students said

“no matter what I do, I receive sub-par grades.”
HEED203
“But if you do the .”
HEED201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam comments are mostly student-friendly because several students mention open-note or notebook-supported tests, though questions can be specific.

Open Note TestsNotebook AllowedStraightforward TestsSpecific Test Questions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly mention open-note or notebook-supported tests, but .

Open Note TestsNotebook AllowedStraightforward Tests
“ , but be sure to have good notes!”
HEED203
“let us use notes and book for every test!”
HEED201
“ if attended lectures.”
HED2030

Online

Online reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Tests Mentioned
“ .”
HEED203
“She was asking weird questions that even if you did read the chapter you wouldn't know without checking back”
HEED203

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she made the lectures interesting and the class was always entertaining.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Mrs. G. , and makes learning fun!”

⚖️

58/100

“sometimes I would get a 100, sometimes i would get a 78.”

📘

80/100

“ , but be sure to have good notes!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she made the lectures interesting and the class was always entertaining.
  • Mrs. G. , and makes learning fun!
  • Very helpful teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • But if you do the .
  • no matter what I do, I receive sub-par grades.
  • .

Theme 3

📝

  • There are a lot of assignments
  • Must attend class for A.
  • DONT MISS A DAY!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across many years give a detailed and fairly consistent picture, despite older comments and some format-label noise.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HEED2037 reviews
HEALTH2 reviews
HEALTH2082 reviews
HED20302 reviews
HEED2012 reviews
Show 5 more courses
HEED32 reviews
WOMENSHEALTH2 reviews
HEED0001 review
HEED2081 review
HEED81 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1