AI Rate Professor

Engineering Technology

Jeremy Edmonds

EET164 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a and are comfortable with hands-on technical learning.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyKnowledgeableHands-on roboticsHelpful supportLow-key class
  • Students describe Edmonds as highly knowledgeable and supportive.
  • The robotics course has real challenge but is structured to help students overcome it.
  • Limited review volume makes the evidence positive but not broad.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The course seems grade-friendly and low-key, but one review still notes normal robotics challenges.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The class is approachable because he prepares students for common robotics pitfalls, but the subject still has technical challenge.

Only in-person evidence exists, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend him because , and makes technical material manageable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

One A+ and a low-key description suggest lenient outcomes, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

The class is described as easy and low-key, with no reports of .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and workload detail is limited.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students describe him as outstanding, knowledgeable, and willing to go above and beyond when students are stuck.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention hands-on robotics and alarm-system work but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment details are sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and low-key engineering class with practical robotics work.

Main concern

The main concern is that the evidence comes from only two reviews.

What students said

“Jeremy is a wealth of engineering knowledge and robotics wisdom.”
EET164
“Easy, Low-key class.”
EET164

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, or final structure.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Jeremy is a wealth of engineering knowledge and robotics wisdom.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting teaching support and course feel; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“He is an outstanding teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“And whenever you are stuck, he goes above and beyond to help you out.”

📈 Course Feel

76/100

“Easy, Low-key class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Jeremy is a wealth of engineering knowledge and robotics wisdom.
  • He tailors his curriculum so his students encounter those normal pitfalls with the right preparation and resources to overcome them.

Theme 2

🛠️ About Hands-On Learning

  • Pretty fun trying to bypass alarm systems.
  • And whenever you are stuck, he goes above and beyond to help you out.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and one is much older and very brief despite the positive agreement.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EET1642 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values