AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Richard Leonard

ATCH166 · ATCH186 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you value automotive experience and and inconsistent support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInconsistent gradingAttendance-heavy labsInformative lecturesOften unavailableLong-winded stories
  • Student experiences are sharply split between caring expertise and and availability.
  • The course content is usually easy, but attendance and .
  • Tests can be student-friendly when handwritten notes are allowed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Getting an A seems possible in the easier sections, but , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students often call the class easy and informative, though lectures can be long and unfocused.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and as central to success, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is weak because , and poor availability despite some praise for real-world knowledge.

Only in-person students provided recommendation evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

as inconsistent and sometimes punitive, even though some students earned A grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload sounds manageable if students attend labs and , but .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

He is informative and experienced, but , and inconsistent support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and a small number of tests.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe an easy but and inconsistent grading concerns.

Main concern

Students report , and .

What students said

“ as punishment, and likes to see people fail.”
ATCH166
“He allowed use of handwritten notes for the 2 tests which made them very easy.”
ATCH166
“ . Don't miss a lab.”
ATCH166

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The two tests, making them very easy.

Handwritten Notes AllowedTwo TestsLab Participation Matters

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence supports student-friendly tests using handwritten notes, but does .

Handwritten Notes AllowedTwo Tests
“He allowed use of handwritten notes for the 2 tests which made them very easy.”
ATCH166

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have had nothing but problems with this professor, from inconsistent grading when comparing my work with my peers, to his regular absence in themselves and being completely unreachable in case of issues/questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

43/100

“Learned a lot during the class, he was very informative.”

⚖️

28/100

“ as punishment, and likes to see people fail.”

📌

18/100

“ . Don't miss a lab.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Extremely long winded, talks about irrelevant topics in class.
  • He was thorough with his lectures, and .

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades and Attendance

  • as punishment, and likes to see people fail.
  • As long as you show up and participate in the .
  • . Don't miss a lab.

Theme 3

🧰 About Practical Value

  • He teaches because he cares about the future of the automotive industry and wants to equip students with real-world knowledge for success.
  • Learned a lot during the class, he was very informative.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

and show consistent themes, but the sample is small and opinions are polarized.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ATCH1664 reviews
ATCH1861 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1