AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Kathryn Logan

POLS201 · POLS204 · POLS202 · POLSC2 · POLS206 · INTROINTOPOLI · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her if you like political science and will read closely, but if vague or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeableInteresting lecturesReading requiredTricky examsMixed clarity
  • Students praise her passion and political knowledge, especially in newer reviews.
  • Success depends on doing the readings carefully because quizzes and .
  • Older reviews often complain , and limited help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say you must keep up with readings and prepare for detailed or tricky exams.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The political science content is manageable, but exams and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews , but they strongly imply lectures and .

Only in-person reviews mention class participation and lecture value.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Recommended for students who value a passionate, informed instructor, though and uneven teaching.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but many describe exams as tricky or harshly detailed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The , and exams rather than constant assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Her teaching is often described as passionate and knowledgeable, but clarity and engagement vary sharply by reviewer.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments focus heavily on quizzes, scantron tests, essays, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and sometimes inspiring teacher whose exams reward careful reading but can feel tricky or vague.

Main concern

to readings.

What students said

“ , so make sure you understand the readings/topics/notes, don't skim over them.”
POLS202
“If you pay attention in class and .”
POLS201
“she WILL try and trick you numerous times on the tests”
POLS204

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe detailed and , but do not clearly prove open-book rules or .

Detailed TestsReading-Based QuizzesTricky WordingEssays

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention detailed tests, pre-lecture quizzes, scantron tests, essays, and tricky wording, but .

Detailed TestsReading-Based QuizzesScantron TestsEssaysTricky Wording
“ ”
POLS202
“ ”
POLS202
“tries to trick you on the tests”
POLS201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and reading load. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She's passionate and highly informed, which meant every lecture was fascinating.”

📚 Effort Needed

58/100

“This isn't a class you can just skate through without putting in the effort and .”

📝

45/100

“ interpret, but I always did well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing teacher. and interesting.
  • Very boring teacher, not very helpful, tries to trick you on the .
  • She's extremely knowledgeable and has a very interesting grasp on the big picture of politics.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you pay attention in class and .
  • On the other hand, she's easy and .
  • No opportunities. Still, she is very knowledgeable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across many years give a consistent picture of , and .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLS2026 reviews
POLS2013 reviews
POLSC22 reviews
INTROINTOPOLI1 review
POLS2041 review
Show 1 more courses
POLS2061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values