AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Mostafa Chinichian

ENGR217 · ENGR17 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can teach yourself from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandBook-dependentDisorganized lecturesMixed gradingExam-heavy
  • Most students say lectures are because of speech, handwriting, and organization issues.
  • Several reviews say students must learn from the book, internet, labs, and classmates.
  • Grades can be survivable, but the teaching experience is consistently weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Good grades are possible, but , and extra problems to survive.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Some ENGR17 material starts familiar and easy, but later content and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but students attend to track topics because .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

because the and self-teaching is often required.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

easy grading comments but and no curve.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Students mention reading the book, lab reports, quizzes, tests, and extra problems, but not an .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Repeated comments cite , and limited help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

, and lab reports, with four tests worth 60 percent in one course.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe unclear lectures, poor handwriting, and heavy reliance on the textbook.

Main concern

You may need to learn most material independently.

What students said

“I basically had to learn everything from the book and internet.”
ENGR217
“Hard to understand in both speaking and writing.”
ENGR17
“His , and overall his lectures are useless.”
ENGR217

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policies vary by course, with some student-friendly note or open-book quiz elements but .

One Page of Notes AllowedOpen Book QuizzesFour Tests Worth 60 PercentShort Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, including one-page notes on tests and open-book quizzes in one course.

One Page of Notes AllowedOpen Book QuizzesFour Tests Worth 60 PercentFinal Exam
“Four tests are worth 60% of your grade.”
ENGR17
“you are allowed a page of .”
ENGR17
“The .”
ENGR217

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I basically had to learn everything from the book and internet.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“His , and overall his lectures are useless.”

📚

35/100

“USE THE BOOK, kick ass in the lab reports, and study with people.”

⚖️

50/100

“ and tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hard to understand in both speaking and writing.
  • The and .
  • His , and overall his lectures are useless.

Theme 2

📖 About Learning Strategy

  • I basically had to learn everything from the book and internet.
  • USE THE BOOK, kick ass in the lab reports, and study with people.
  • Expect to read the book and do a lot of extra problems.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams and Grades

  • Four tests are worth 60% of your grade.
  • The .
  • format), and tests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed reviews over many years show a consistent pattern of and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGR176 reviews
ENGR2173 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values