AI Rate Professor

English

Allen Dailey

ENG099 · ENG201A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider him if and support, but expect mixed class value and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGreat feedbackCaring supportMixed usefulnessSome unfair gradingModerate work
  • , and writing support, while one review calls the class a waste of time.
  • Workload appears moderate, with reading and a large journaling requirement in at least one course.
  • because one student felt assignments were graded unfairly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The work is manageable for some students, but , and possible unfair grading prevent it from being an easy A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Some material is described as basic and easy, though the reading and journaling still require steady effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because a review tag says skipping class means you will not pass.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

and care, but one strongly negative review lowers confidence.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, but one student explicitly says some assignments were graded unfairly.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The class includes reading and a 70-page journaling notebook, but one student says the rest is pretty easy.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He is described as inspiring, caring, and strong with feedback, though one student found the class repetitive and not useful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention writing, essays, assignments, feedback, reading, and journaling with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

but lean positive, with strong praise for feedback and care balanced and wasted time.

Main concern

The small sample shows inconsistent student experience and .

What students said

“ !”
ENG201A
“Class is a waste of time.”
ENG201A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very inspiring and caring teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Allen was definitely the .”

⚖️

48/100

“I was definitely not too happy with the way he graded a few of ”

📚 Workload

58/100

“It is a little bit of work considering you need to pile up 70 pages in a notebook of "journaling" but the rest is pretty easy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very inspiring and caring teacher.
  • !
  • Class is a waste of time.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • he graded a few of
  • you need to pile up 70 pages in a notebook of "journaling"
  • the rest is pretty easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and they give mixed views with limited detail on grading and assessments.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG201A2 reviews
ENG0991 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values