AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

David Sanchez

CJ226 · CJ · CJ206 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid David Sanchez unless and are comfortable with story-based lectures and strict memorization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesStrict memorizationTough gradingStory-heavy classesOccasionally caring
  • Most reviews criticize unclear teaching, heavy reliance on stories, and poor preparation.
  • as strict, memorization-heavy, and unforgiving in CJ206.
  • A minority of students , and willingness to help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades require memorizing details and , though one student earned an A by studying lectures and materials closely.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content itself sounds manageable, but and strict memorization make it harder than it should be.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though they do mention lateness, absences, and quiz preparation.

evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and preparation is criticized.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and mostly negative with one supportive review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students describe tough , and failing over small wording issues.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and memorizing definitions from the book word for word.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Most students describe poor clarity, unpreparedness, and lectures driven by stories or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews mention reading, papers, assignments, quizzes, and memorization, so evaluation .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear instruction, strict memorization, and unprofessional habits, with one and support.

Main concern

The main concern is that lectures may not clearly teach what is tested or graded.

What students said

“ .”
CJ206
“He is often late, absent, amd completely unprepared.”
CJ206
“ .”
CJ226

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , but quizzes and memorization are described as strict and unforgiving.

Pop quizzesStrict memorizationBook-based definitions

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exact definition memorization, but they do not clearly prove midterm, final, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Pop quizzesStrict memorizationBook-based definitions
“prepare to memorize every single definition from the book letter for letter.”
CJ206
“Word for word or you will fail.”
CJ206
“study them and the materials he gives you to be prepared for the quizzes.”
CJ

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ , and we spend a lot of time discussing opinions.”

⚖️

22/100

“Word for word or you will fail.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“Professor Sanchez is not the homie. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He spends the whole time telling stories and .
  • bases off of personal experience instead of the .
  • His lectures aren't bad, you just need to really study them and the materials he gives you to be prepared for the quizzes.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • .
  • If definition from the book letter for letter.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 in-person reviews are available, but they include detailed and mostly consistent criticism with .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CJ2064 reviews
CJ1 review
CJ2261 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1