AI Rate Professor

Art

Patty Arnold

ART266 · ARTSECT · ART256 · ART153 · ART267 · ART268 · ART259 · ART265 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and are willing to put real effort into creative projects.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeable design mentorHelpful feedbackCreative projectsPatient and encouragingReal-world skills
  • Students consistently describe Patty Arnold as knowledgeable, patient, helpful, and genuinely skilled in design software.
  • The work can be rigorous and time-consuming, but students usually find the , and portfolio worthy.
  • and effort-based rather than automatic, with and due dates.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A looks realistic for engaged students, but comments emphasize effort, skill-building, and .

The evidence is mainly in person, while the single .

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The content is manageable with her help, but design software and as the course progresses.

In-person comments describe the course challenge clearly; online evidence does not show enough about content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Reviews do not prove a , but participation matters appears in the online tags and class involvement seems useful.

Online evidence mentions participation, while in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and helps students build practical design skills.

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation strength is driven mostly by the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

and effort-based, with one review saying effort will reflect the grade.

Format shift

, while the online review does not clarify grading.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is meaningful because projects are often rigorous and time-consuming, though students usually find them worthwhile.

Format shift

The workload pattern comes from in-person reviews, with .

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students repeatedly praise her as knowledgeable, patient, encouraging, and able to break down difficult software skills.

Format shift

Both formats praise support, but teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Comments focus , and creative assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

, while the online review only mentions feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise her knowledge, patience, helpfulness, creative freedom, and real-world design experience.

Main concern

Projects can become rigorous and .

What students said

“ and time-consuming, but usually fun, highly instructive, and portfolio worthy.”
ART267
“If photoshop and illustrator scare you, take a class from her, she breaks it down so you can handle it.”
ART153

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review praises individual feedback that helps students improve skills.

Main concern

The online evidence is very limited and .

What students said

“ .”
ART256

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Patty is extremely knowledgeable and brings to the table real world experience.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, projects, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Patty is extremely knowledgeable and brings to the table real world experience.”

🛠️ Project Value

50/100

“ and time-consuming, but usually fun, highly instructive, and portfolio worthy.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

95/100

“ ! Your effort will reflect your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable and friendly.
  • She is always there to help!
  • .

Theme 2

🎨 About Projects and Skills

  • Offers a lot of practical experience in web design.
  • We get a lot of creative freedom in the projects.
  • and time-consuming, but usually fun, highly instructive, and portfolio worthy.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She isn't EASY but not hard either.. she makes class enjoyable :]
  • The class seems easy, but the difficulty definitely catches up to you.
  • Your effort will reflect your grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 11 reviews are consistent and detailed, but most are old and only one is online.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART2593 reviews
ART2562 reviews
ART1531 review
ART2651 review
ART2661 review
Show 3 more courses
ART2671 review
ART2681 review
ARTSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1