AI Rate Professor

Medical Assisting

Catherine Ruiz

MAST111 · MAST110 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself, track shifting deadlines, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsConfusing TestsChanging DeadlinesUnsafe Lab TechniquePoor Organization
  • Students report , and assignments.
  • Online testing is described as confusing and answer choices may not match course material.
  • The and safety.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Grades are not impossible, but unclear instructions, changing deadlines, and .

Online evidence emphasizes confusing tests and deadlines, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The challenge appears to come from poor explanations and .

Both online and in-person reviews describe unclear instruction, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

The online review has a strong skip-class warning, but the .

Only the ; the in-person review does not clearly address it.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

because instruction, deadlines, tests, and labs are described as unreliable.

Both formats are negative, with and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Confusing tests and low reported outcomes make grading .

Format shift

Online testing complaints drive most of the ; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload feels heavy because students must verify deadlines and and tests.

Format shift

Online evidence shows deadline instability, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Both reviews , and one questions lab safety.

Format shift

Online teaching issues involve classwork and tests, while and lab technique.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The , while the in-person review focuses on assignments and labs.

Format shift

Online evidence is test-heavy, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person feedback criticizes assignment explanations, field knowledge, and lab safety.

Main concern

The and potentially unsafe.

What students said

“ .”
MAST110
“Very unsafe with lab technique.”
MAST110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online feedback describes unclear instruction, changing deadlines, and .

Main concern

Students may struggle because test questions and .

What students said

“ and labs thoroughly.”
MAST111
“Must triple check all due dates and deadlines with her as they change every few weeks.”
MAST111
“ book yet answer are from her knowledge.”
MAST111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and confusing questions, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

Take-Home TestsConfusing QuestionsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, book policy, midterm, or .

Online

Online tests are described as take-home and , Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Take-Home TestsConfusing QuestionsTest Heavy
“ book yet answer are from her knowledge.”
MAST111
“Many q's do not make sense or do not correlate with answers given.”
MAST111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and labs thoroughly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting recurring problems in teaching, testing, and lab execution. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“ and labs thoroughly.”

🧪 Lab Concerns

22/100

“Very unsafe with lab technique.”

📝

34/100

“Many q's do not make sense or do not correlate with answers given.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and labs thoroughly.
  • .

Theme 2

📝 About Tests And Deadlines

  • Must triple check all due dates and deadlines with her as they change every few weeks.
  • book yet answer are from her knowledge.
  • Many q's do not make sense or do not correlate with answers given.

Theme 3

🧪

  • Very little knowledge on the feild.
  • Very unsafe with lab technique.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

46/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older reviews exist, but both are consistently negative and specific.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAST1101 review
MAST1111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values