AI Rate Professor

Languages

Janis Ward

SPCH1A · SPECH1A · COMM201A · SPCM201A · COM201A · SPCM201 · SPEECH1A730 · SPEECH · SPEEC1A · SP1A · SPEEC201A · SPEECH1A · PUBLICADDRESS · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

unless you , and have no better section available.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear assignmentsHarsh gradingOften lateAvoid if possible
  • Most students describe the class as , and poorly taught.
  • as arbitrary, inconsistent, or tough.
  • A few students found her caring or useful, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The content may not be advanced, but unclear expectations, speech penalties, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Speech class content sounds manageable, but confusing instruction and should.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Missing speeches carries serious penalties, and one tag says skipping class means you will not pass.

and speech penalties.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students mostly do not recommend her because of , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Many students describe grading as random, arbitrary, tough, or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report extra speeches, pointless assignments, and harsh make-up work for missed speeches.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments say she rambles, arrives late, loses work, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

35/100

Assessment appears centered on speeches and assignments, with limited but negative mentions of tests.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly report disorganization, unclear expectations, lateness, and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly and grades unpredictably.

What students said

“She is so unorganized and lost 2 of my speech grades.”
COMM201A
“ . .”
COM201A
“ thing.”
SPEEC201A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly discuss speeches and assignments, and they do not clearly prove a .

Speech-Based GradingUnclear Test EvidenceStrict Missed Speech Penalty

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on speeches and and no clear exam policy.

Speech-Based GradingStrict Missed Speech PenaltyUnclear Test Evidence
“ because she doesn't teach a single thing!”
SPEEC201A
“Miss a speech = 12 page paper.”
SPEECH1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“she talks the whole class about her self and her life stories and .”

⚖️

15/100

“ thing.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“If you cannot get another .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Nothing she says makes much sense.
  • She rambles on and is mono-tone
  • she expected us to learn everything yourself

Theme 2

⚖️

  • grades speeches on however she is feeling
  • Gives arbitrary numbers for grades.
  • Not consistant in grading.

Theme 3

⏰ About Organization

  • She is so unorganized and lost 2 of my speech grades.
  • Never on time.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

There are 28 reviews over many years, and the negative themes are detailed and highly consistent.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 57
1 out of 515

Course coverage

SPEECH1A8 reviews
COMM201A5 reviews
SPEEC201A3 reviews
SPCH1A2 reviews
SPCM201A2 reviews
Show 8 more courses
COM201A1 review
PUBLICADDRESS1 review
SP1A1 review
SPCM2011 review
SPECH1A1 review
SPEEC1A1 review
SPEECH1 review
SPEECH1A7301 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values