AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Janice Cullers-Scott

BUS201 · BUS201A · 201A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you , and strict attendance for possible grade recovery through assignments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganized teachingHeavy homeworkConfusing gradingStrict attendanceCaring but unclear
  • Most students strongly warn against taking the class because instruction and .
  • Homework and can rescue grades, but the workload is heavy and .
  • Attendance penalties are strict, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Homework and can boost grades, but students report , and confusing expectations.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students say basic accounting concepts are poorly explained, making the course feel harder than it should be.

, so difficulty is based entirely on that format.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

because missing more than three unexcused classes can sharply lower the grade.

In-person reviews explicitly report strict attendance penalties, with no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend her because of , and .

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Assignments and can help, but as confusing and penalties are severe.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of homework and online assignments carrying major weight.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students describe her as caring but , and .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Grades , and attendance-related categories.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and strict attendance.

Main concern

Students say the class is disorganized and hard to learn from.

What students said

“ .”
BUS201A
“I , and infuriated.”
201A
“If you miss more than 3 classes unexcused, your grade will drop 14%.”
BUS201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention difficult tests and mislabeled online work, but .

Difficult testsOnline assignmentsQuiz policy unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and online assignments, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book status.

Difficult testsOnline assignments called quizzes
“I got C's and ”
BUS201A
“ " and "EC" and then yelled at us claiming they were quizzes!”
BUS201A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She has .”

⚖️

28/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Homework is almost 50% of your grade which is awesome.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and won't own up to her mistakes when the class corrects her.
  • She may have the experience, but she has no idea how to teach important concepts.
  • She does not clearly answer questions and she often gives incorrect .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Workload

  • Homework is almost 50% of your grade which is awesome.
  • I got C's and and from and doing my hw I got an 88% in the class.
  • If you miss more than 3 classes unexcused, your grade will drop 14%.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and mostly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BUS201A2 reviews
201A1 review
BUS2011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1