AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Raymond Ried

ENG226 · ENG248 · ENGR210 · INTRO3194 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can handle some self-guided learning and are willing to ask .

Best fit · Self Taught ProKnowledgeableHelpful When AskedLaid BackSometimes UnclearOpen-Book Exams
  • Students like his easygoing personality, knowledge, and helpfulness when they ask questions.
  • Teaching clarity is uneven, especially for students without prior programming experience.
  • Open-textbook exams and manageable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Grades seem attainable with effort because he is laid back and exams allow textbooks, but .

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The course is manageable but can be difficult when explanations are unclear or students lack programming background.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , though his style is described as laid back.

Only in-person reviews are available, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

, and engaging style despite clarity issues.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

because exams allow textbook use and students describe him as easygoing.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Workload is not described as heavy, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students value his knowledge and support, but repeated comments say .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention assignments and the course.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and laid-back teacher who is helpful but .

Main concern

The .

What students said

“Ray is one of the if you ask me”
ENG248
“ but in the event of confusion... ask and you shall receive.”
ENG226
“ ”
ENGR210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam style is student-friendly because one review says textbooks are allowed during exams.

Open-Textbook Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but not webcam, Lockdown Browser, proctoring, or open-book beyond textbook access.

Open-Textbook Exams
“he allows the use of textbooks during the .”
ENG226

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but in the event of confusion... ask and you shall receive.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Raymond Reid is such a good teacher. He always kept me interested.”

📘

86/100

“he allows the use of textbooks during the .”

👍 Recommendation Level

82/100

“ engineering or a related field.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Raymond Reid is such a good teacher. He always kept me interested.
  • Ray is a very cool laid back guy.
  • Mr. Ried is a very quiet understated teacher.

Theme 2

🧠 About Clarity & Difficulty

  • but in the event of confusion... ask and you shall receive.
  • If you don't have while to catch on, but then it will get easier.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • and .
  • Ask him questions and he'll answer them.
  • Ray is one of the if you ask me

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because four reviews are consistent on strengths and clarity issues, but the evidence is older and limited.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG2261 review
ENG2481 review
ENGR2101 review
INTRO31941 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values