AI Rate Professor

English

Carol Achterkirchen

ENG012 · ENG1A · ENG1 · ENG201B · ENGLISH56 · ENG56 · ENGLSIH1A · ENGL201 · ENG201 · ENGLISH1A · ENGL2013 · ENG · ENGL201A · ENG201A · ENGL104 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you specifically want a demanding writing course and , and unclear directions.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery tough graderUnclear instructionsHeavy essaysStrict attendancePolarizing teaching style
  • Most students describe her as extremely difficult, harsh, and unclear.
  • as strict, unpredictable, or unfair.
  • A minority say she is intelligent and can improve writing if students accept a demanding style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students repeatedly say strong effort still may not produce good grades because and unpredictable.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course content is not just hard because of English topics, but because , and strict expectations make it difficult to navigate.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is strict, with lateness or absences carrying serious consequences.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students strongly discourage taking her because , and classroom experience unpleasant.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Reviews repeatedly describe her as a tough, unpredictable, or and research papers.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students mention , and time-consuming busy work.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments describe unclear instructions, poor support, boredom, and rude interactions, though a few students found her knowledgeable.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews focus almost , and class discussion rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe a and , though a few students value the challenge.

Main concern

The biggest concern is harsh essay grading combined with .

What students said

“ no better than a C.”
ENG201A
“ , and never explained work clearly.”
ENG1A
“The work (which there's too much of) is useless and time consuming.”
ENG201A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final requirements.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ no better than a C.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“instructions are like running a maze.”

⚖️

8/100

“I spent hours and and never got a good grade...i got an F in the class.”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“The work (which there's too much of) is useless and time consuming.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

16/100

“Good luck, but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • instructions are like running a maze.
  • Nice lady but confusing.
  • She helps you with almost nothing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • no better than a C.
  • I spent hours and and never got a good grade...i got an F in the class.
  • She is definitely not particularly easy.

Theme 3

📚

  • The work (which there's too much of) is useless and time consuming.
  • , and never explained work clearly.
  • if you can devote a lot of tim

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • and fair.
  • She is extremely sharp. I learned a lot!
  • she was a nice professor outside of class but was all business inside.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 38 in-person reviews across many years with , and attendance.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 511
1 out of 514

Course coverage

ENG1A9 reviews
ENG201A7 reviews
ENG565 reviews
ENGLISH1A5 reviews
ENGL201A2 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ENG1 review
ENG0121 review
ENG11 review
ENG2011 review
ENG201B1 review
ENGL1041 review
ENGL2011 review
ENGL20131 review
ENGLISH561 review
ENGLSIH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1