AI Rate Professor

English

W Walters

ENG156 · ENGL201A · ENG201 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take Walters only if , and potentially strict grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GradingHeavy ReadingMixed TeachingParticipation Expected
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with some students praising his respect and help while and excessive work.
  • The course appears reading- and writing-heavy, especially in ENG201.
  • Attendance and participation were expected in the reviewed in-person classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Getting an A seems difficult because and heavy expectations.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The content feels challenging because , and outside work.

, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and participation were expected in at least one reviewed class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on fit because positive comments praise him while negative comments warn strongly against taking him.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Multiple students describe .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report , and several long papers.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and helpful but criticism of attitude and focus.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize papers, readings, homework, discussion boards, group work, and outside assignments more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a demanding English class with mixed teaching quality and a real risk of .

Main concern

Workload and .

What students said

“RIDICULOUS amounts of , and outside work.”
ENG201
“ get better than a C on any of the papers.”
ENG156
“He's a really understanding and respectable teacher.”
ENGL201A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“RIDICULOUS amounts of , and outside work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He's a really understanding and respectable teacher.”

⚖️

25/100

“ get better than a C on any of the papers.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“RIDICULOUS amounts of , and outside work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Walters is an excellent english professor.
  • He is an awesome teacher! Super personable and helpful.
  • Never seems happy for class, talks more about politics than the readings.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • get better than a C on any of the papers.
  • And the majority of my class barely passed.
  • but only 3 long ones.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews span several years and give consistent workload concerns, but the sample is small and some comments are vague or old.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL201A3 reviews
ENG2012 reviews
ENG1561 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values