AI Rate Professor

Family Studies

Linda Mintz

FAMST112 · FMST · FAMST212 · FMST280 · FMST218 · FMST212 · FS18 · FAMST280 · FMST278 · FMSTFMST · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if , and tolerate uneven teaching quality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed tough examsMandatory attendanceUnfair grading concernsBoring lecturesExtra credit available
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with several students calling the .
  • Exams are often described as detailed or hard, though .
  • Attendance and punctuality matter heavily, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A can be possible with , and strong journals, but and unfair grading complaints keep it from being easy.

Online evidence is negative about tough exams, while in-person evidence is mixed with , and extra credit.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The content itself sounds manageable, but , and rambling lectures make the class feel harder.

Online evidence only says exams are tough, while guides, journals, and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

as required and tied to points.

Online mentions no bathroom or lateness flexibility, and in-person reviews repeatedly describe mandatory attendance or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is weak because negative reviews repeatedly , and an unfriendly tone.

The single online review is negative, while but lean risky overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students report , and tests that get harder when the class performs well.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews provide the strongest evidence of strict grading.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews mention detailed tests, lots of busy work, journals, classwork, and broad study demands.

Format shift

Online evidence , while in-person reviews describe heavier ongoing work.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students found her helpful, but and an unfriendly or belittling style.

Format shift

The online review is negative, while experience.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to combine detailed exams with , and .

Format shift

Online evidence only mentions exams, while , journals, attendance, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with praise for and partner tests but repeated complaints , and unfair grading.

Main concern

, and inconsistent teaching quality.

What students said

“No study guide or review. .”
FMST 278
“ - and !”
FMST212
“Easy "A" if you're on time and turn in a quality journal.”
FMST280

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is strongly negative and mentions strict bathroom and .

Main concern

Strict class rules and .

What students said

“not fun class, she isnt friendly most of the time and you cant use the bathroom or be late at all.”
FMST
“ ..”
FMST

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

no review to partner tests, study guides, and a possible skipped final.

Detailed ExamsTough ExamsPartner TestsStudy Guide Sometimes ProvidedFinal Can Sometimes Be Skipped

Assessment risk

Varies

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe detailed exams, occasional partner testing, study guides in some sections, and a .

Detailed ExamsPartner TestsStudy Guide Sometimes ProvidedFinal Can Sometimes Be Skipped
“No study guide or review. .”
FMST 278
“The exams were very detailed (so expect to know small details), but .”
FMSTFMST
“ if you are satisfied with your grade at the end of the term.”
FMST212

Online

The and does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or platform policy.

Tough ExamsExam policy not clearly proven
“ ..”
FMST

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy "A" if you're on time and turn in a quality journal.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“She is mean. Grades very unfairly.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“Turn in a lot of busy work, the was learned really.”

👍 Recommendation Split

35/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • , and teaches very bland classes.
  • and knew what she was talking about.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Grades very unfairly.
  • Easy "A" if you're on time and turn in a quality journal.
  • For partner which made them wayyy easier.

Theme 3

⏰

  • - and !
  • if you are late.
  • you cant use the bathroom or be late at all.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 12 reviews across several years with detailed but mixed experiences, making the themes useful but not fully current.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

FMST2122 reviews
FS182 reviews
FAMST1121 review
FAMST2121 review
FAMST2801 review
Show 5 more courses
FMST1 review
FMST 2781 review
FMST2181 review
FMST2801 review
FMSTFMST1 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values