AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Dawn Brown

NUT201 · NUTRITION224 · NUTR224 · NUT215 · NUTR210 · NUT210 · NUT224 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
59/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if possible, but be cautious with online sections because reviews describe harsh grading and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong in personHarsh online gradingClear test guidanceNutrition knowledgeBoring at times
  • clarity and helpfulness.
  • Online NUTR224 reviews are strongly negative for , and .
  • Grades can be fair with steady study, but online students report a much worse experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some students call it an Easy A, but others say , and careful test preparation.

In-person evidence is more grade-friendly, while and harder exams.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Nutrition content is understandable with notes and study guides in person, but online students find the and fact-heavy.

In-person sections seem clearer and easier than online NUTR224 sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

, but in-person students say class notes, review activities, and pop quizzes matter for success.

and test preparation, while online reviews do not discuss attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and help, but online reviews strongly warn about confusion and .

, while online sentiment is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, but online students repeatedly call grading harsh.

Format shift

Online reviews .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

, and discussions, with some students saying there is hardly any homework.

Format shift

In-person workload sounds lighter, while online workload feels harder because assignments and .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is often clear and , but online students describe poor organization and .

Format shift

Teaching experience is positive in person and negative online.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Reviews emphasize quizzes, tests, exams, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention tests, but online reviews .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly , and manageable work when students study.

Main concern

Some students find the class dry, boring, or still semi-hard.

What students said

“ as to what will be on the quizzes and test so you know what to study!”
NUT201
“Easy A. You will need the text book.”
NUT215
“I got and A in the class, but I never skipped class and I worked very hard.”
NUTR210

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews , and difficult memorization-heavy exams.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Class is all over the place and quite frustrating! as well.”
NUTR224
“ on concepts learned in class”
NUTR224
“ and .”
NUT224

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and test-focused, with online reviews reporting hard memorization and statistics questions.

Hard Online TestsStatistics On ExamsMemorization ExamsPop QuizzesFour Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and review guidance, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Pop QuizzesFour TestsStudy Guide From Notes
“ as to what will be on the quizzes and test so you know what to study!”
NUT201
“There are five quizzes and four tests.”
NUTR210
“Make sure to always review the notes prior to each class for the pop quizzes.”
NUT210

Online

Online reviews say tests are hard and focus on statistics or small memorized facts, but .

Hard Online TestsStatistics On ExamsMemorization Exams
“ .”
NUTRITION224
“The and not important facts.”
NUTR224
“ on concepts learned in class”
NUTR224

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are going to take nutrition, take !”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ .”

⚖️

48/100

“ and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dawn is one of so far.
  • and funny.
  • Terrible! This professor is the

Theme 2

📈 About Tests And Grades

  • Easy A. You will need the text book.
  • .
  • I got and A in the class, but I never skipped class and I worked very hard.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • Of all the online Nutrition classes I have taken, this one is by far the .
  • Class is all over the place and quite frustrating! as well.
  • topic

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 15 reviews with and consistent differences between online and in-person experiences.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NUTR2106 reviews
NUT2102 reviews
NUT2242 reviews
NUTR2242 reviews
NUT2011 review
Show 2 more courses
NUT2151 review
NUTRITION2241 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1