AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Judith Cross

PHILOSOPHY6 · PHIL01 · PHIL206 · PHILO1 · PHIL13 · PHIL6 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if you can handle long philosophy lectures and study from notes, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny but polarizingLecture-heavyClear expectationsCurved testsHeavy final
  • Students split sharply between finding her fun and helpful or boring and confusing.
  • The course is lecture-heavy, so attention span matters more than raw ability.
  • , and repeated final material, but some exams carry high weight.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

An A seems possible with good notes and exam prep, but and a .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Philosophy content is described as hard to understand, but and topics easier.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Many students liked her humor and support, but several strongly criticized her lectures and clarity.

Recommendation and is mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and reused final questions help, but a 50% final and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly papers, two midterms, and a .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Her teaching is praised as funny and helpful by some students but confusing and boring by others.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment , and a cumulative final.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a funny, knowledgeable instructor whose lecture style is either engaging or .

Main concern

Long lectures and a .

What students said

“ !”
PHIL6
“There are 2 midterms and weekly papers.”
PHILO1
“I couldn't comprehend her lectures.”
PHIL206

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style varies by course, with some student-friendly supports but also a .

Two MidtermsWeekly PapersCumulative FinalCurved TestsBook Use On Essay Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, book use on essay tests, and a cumulative final.

Two MidtermsWeekly PapersCumulative FinalCurved TestsBook Use On Essay Tests
“There are 2 midterms and weekly papers.”
PHILO1
“ !”
PHIL6
“She let's you use your books on the essay tests”
PHIL13

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She made me really enjoy Philosophy and she really wants you to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“ if you ask questions, and she goes over stuff very thoroughly.”

⚖️

62/100

“ !”

🧠 Lecture Risk

50/100

“I couldn't comprehend her lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's crazy, it's great.
  • and funny.
  • Lecture is boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There are 2 midterms and weekly papers.
  • !
  • as well.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit

  • I couldn't comprehend her lectures.
  • The subject is hard to understand and sometimes listening to her lecture can make me sleepy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 11 reviews across many years with consistent themes, but many are old and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL63 reviews
PHILOSOPHY63 reviews
PHIL2062 reviews
PHIL011 review
PHIL131 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values