AI Rate Professor

Academic Skills Development

Mark Tomes

ASCKASCK · ACSK075 · MATHACSK · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExtremely helpfulClear explanationsEncouragingPatient supportHighly liked
  • Every review gives him the highest quality rating and emphasizes support.
  • Students and accessibly.
  • The class appears approachable, though there is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

The low difficulty and strong support suggest grades are attainable, but reviews do not call it a free A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students say , making the course beginner-friendly.

Only in-person reviews describe course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and personally supportive.

Recommendation and is uniformly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Difficulty ratings are low, but reviews provide .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Reviews describe the material as understandable and low-difficulty without mentioning heavy work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently praise his clarity, patience, encouragement, and willingness to help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether the class relies more on assignments or exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, but assessment details are not clearly stated.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as , and encouraging.

Main concern

The small review count and exams.

What students said

“Very helpful and good at explaining the material in a way most everyone can understand.”
ACSK075
“Loved him. I wish all teachers were like him!”
ASCKASCK
“He helped me enormously.”
MATHACSK

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very helpful and good at explaining the material in a way most everyone can understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Very helpful and good at explaining the material in a way most everyone can understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“Loved him. I wish all teachers were like him!”

❤️ Student Support

96/100

“He's always in a good mood and willing to sit down with his students if they're having difficulties.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very helpful and good at explaining the material in a way most everyone can understand.
  • Mark is an awesome teacher!

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He is a and encouraging.
  • Loved him. I wish all teachers were like him!

Theme 3

🤝 About Support

  • He helped me enormously.
  • He's always in a good mood and willing to sit down with his students if they're having difficulties.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, and they are positive but too few and vague for high confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACSK0751 review
ASCKASCK1 review
MATHACSK1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values