AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Kurt Voelker

CSC141 · CIS201 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can teach yourself and already have strong interest in the subject.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing ExamplesSelf-Teaching RequiredHelpful One-on-OneUnfocused Lectures
  • Most comments say and examples contain errors.
  • Students may need to rely heavily on the book instead of class.
  • One positive and covers broad computer science context.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The class seems low in difficulty, but comments give little proof that an A .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is not described as extremely hard, but broad lectures and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

because and require self-teaching.

The recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Difficulty ratings are low, but comments as generous or harsh.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The workload sounds centered on reading and two tests, but self-teaching can add effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Two of three reviews describe lectures as , and not useful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

One review describes it as a read-the-book class with two tests.

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about and broken examples.

Main concern

Students may learn little from lecture and need to read the book independently.

What students said

“You will learn zero from him.”
CIS201
“Read the book.”
CSC141
“ and beyond to help me understand more about Computer Science and the industries involved.”
CIS201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention two tests but do not clearly .

Two TestsExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the .

Two TestsExam Policy Unclear
“It's pretty much a read the book and .”
CIS201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will learn zero from him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity and self-teaching burden. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“All of his in class examples are full of errors.”

📚 Self-Teaching Risk

25/100

“Read the book.”

🤝 Helpful Support

45/100

“ and beyond to help me understand more about Computer Science and the industries involved.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All of his in class examples are full of errors.
  • Many times class just ends with .
  • He rambles about aristotle in class, and how important the material is and how it's relevant.

Theme 2

📚 About Learning Experience

  • You will learn zero from him.
  • Read the book.
  • he will cover quite a bit of information about programing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, though the negative teaching complaints are consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CIS2012 reviews
CSC1411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values