AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Linda Bomstad

PHIL201A · PHILO206 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a patient philosophy teacher and can handle a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExperienced teacherPatient and kindFlexible with papersTest-heavy gradingPhilosophy clarity
  • Students strongly praise Bomstad as knowledgeable, patient, and experienced.
  • , but .
  • Students who attend, study, and ask for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is realistic with attendance, studying, and asking for paper feedback, but .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Philosophy concepts are complex, but students say and posts useful study material.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Reviews , but they suggest going to class and studying posted material matters.

and is not described as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and flexible with student support.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

She is flexible with papers and will review drafts, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students mention little to no homework, with the main workload concentrated in papers, studying, and a few tests.

Format shift

but test-centered stakes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe her as experienced, enlightened, patient, kind, and strong at explaining difficult philosophy.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews say few tests are a major part of the grade, though papers also matter in at least one course.

Format shift

paper support.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are very positive, emphasizing patience, knowledge, flexibility, and strong support for students.

Main concern

The course may be risky for because a .

What students said

“Dr. Bomstat is a great teacher.”
206
“ and the ”
PHILO206
“ and kind while explaining the complexities of philosophy.”
PHIL201A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention a few important tests, but they do not prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.

Few TestsTest-Heavy Grade

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

weight, but and proctoring rules are not clearly proven.

Few TestsTest-Heavy Grade
“the ”
PHILO206

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and kind while explaining the complexities of philosophy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Professor Bomstad is a wonderful teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Level

90/100

“But if that's not the case then go for it!”

⚖️

74/100

“She is funny and as many times as you need to get an A before the due date”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Bomstat is a great teacher.
  • Linda was one of the most enlightened instructors I have ever met.
  • and kind while explaining the complexities of philosophy.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • and the
  • If you go to class and study the material she posts online, you will easily pass this class.
  • She is very flexible for papers and things.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, but they are detailed and consistently positive.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

2061 review
PHIL201A1 review
PHILO2061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values