AI Rate Professor

Biological Sciences

Shanda Green

BIO205 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want an engaging biology professor and are willing to study consistently for exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging LecturerHelpful ProfessorPowerPoint BasedStudy Guides HelpEffort Pays Off
  • Students consistently describe her as funny, upbeat, helpful, and engaging.
  • The class rewards studying, especially using her study guides and lecture materials.
  • , but students still need steady effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Students say doing well is very possible, but it requires studying and real effort rather than minimal work.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

, and engaging lectures make the course manageable even though exams require preparation.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend her because , and makes biology interesting.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Grades appear fair because students who study the provided materials and put in effort can do well.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is manageable but , and studying lecture material.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently describe her as funny, interesting, helpful, and strong at keeping class engaging.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and lecture-based exam content.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly , and fair effort-based success.

Main concern

Students still need to study hard for tests and oral exams.

What students said

“Really good professor, upbeat and funny.”
BIO205
“Her ”
BIO205
“If you put in the time and effort in this class you can do really well.”
BIO205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and lecture-based, with and oral exams.

Three TestsFinal ExamOral ExamsLecture-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, oral exams, and exams based on lecture content, but do not prove proctoring or open-book policy.

Three TestsFinal ExamOral ExamsLecture-Based Exams
“There are 3 tests plus the ”
BIO205
“ .”
BIO205

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in the time and effort in this class you can do really well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and effort. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“I love her!!! She is an amazing teacher that will keep you awake during class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ !”

⚖️ Effort And Grades

68/100

“If you put in the time and effort in this class you can do really well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really good professor, upbeat and funny.
  • Great teacher. Made class very interesting.
  • Very funny and interesting professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Her , but make sure you look over them and study hard!
  • .
  • If you put in the time and effort in this class you can do really well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are consistent and include useful details about teaching and exams.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIO2054 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values