AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Anthony Moye

CHEM201A · CHEM1A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you are comfortable working independently in a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRudeHard GraderPoor HelpLab FocusedKnows Material
  • Most students describe Moye as rude, condescending, and discouraging when students ask questions.
  • as harsh, though one student says strong effort can lead to A-level writeups.
  • He appears knowledgeable, but the student experience is highly negative for most reviewers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A is possible only with strong lab writeups and effort, while many students describe the grading as very harsh.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The lab feels difficult because students must follow instructions closely and handle demanding writeups with limited help.

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One review warns not to be late, and the , though no full attendance policy is described.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students advise avoiding him because they find him rude, unhelpful, and harsh in grading.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Several students call him a hard grader or say he searches for errors, despite one student reporting A .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload centers on demanding lab writeups where students must be precise and self-reliant.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

He knows chemistry and , but most students describe rude behavior and weak support.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on labs and lab writeups rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

who grades strictly and often responds poorly to questions.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report rude treatment, poor help, and .

What students said

“ .”
CHEM201A
“He makes students afraid to ask questions”
CHEM1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on lab writeups and do not clearly prove exam .

Lab WriteupsNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove any exam policy.

Lab WriteupsNo Clear Exam Policy
“I .”
CHEM201A
“He makes it his goal to find errors in .”
CHEM201A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He makes students afraid to ask questions, He often insults students who come to him with genuine questions, Does not care for the students, Grades on a ridiculous scale.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom treatment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“The .”

⚖️

20/100

“He makes it his goal to find errors in .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He knows his stuff and .
  • Not once have i seen him answer questions in the lab and his very rude to other students.
  • He makes students afraid to ask questions

Theme 2

⚖️

  • and doesn't help very well.
  • Grades on a ridiculous scale.
  • I .

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • Most condescending, disrespectful person I have ever met, let alone a teacher!
  • Hardest and rudest teacher at Cuesta.
  • He was rude, but only to people who didn't care/try.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed but older reviews show a consistent negative pattern with one notable positive counterpoint.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM201A6 reviews
CHEM1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values