AI Rate Professor

English

Medley Carson

ENGL156 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

because the single review is negative but too vague for a complete judgment.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPoor ExperienceLow DifficultyNot Worth Time
  • The only review is strongly negative despite reporting very low difficulty.
  • There is not enough detail to judge teaching methods, grading, workload, or exams confidently.
  • The comment suggests poor value rather than academic challenge.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The reported difficulty is very low, but the review does not confirm grades or .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

The low difficulty rating suggests easy content, though the comment gives no academic detail.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

No online evidence exists, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The only student comment is strongly negative and says the course wastes time.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There is , so leniency cannot be proven.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Light

80/100

The difficulty rating is low, but workload is not directly described.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

The only review reports a very disappointing experience with no positive teaching evidence.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not mention assignments, exams, papers, or other assessment methods.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The only in-person review says the class was disappointing and a waste of time.

Main concern

The review gives almost no actionable detail beyond strong dissatisfaction.

What students said

“VERY DISAPOINTED. You lose time.”
ENGL156

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“VERY DISAPOINTED. You lose time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“VERY DISAPOINTED. You lose time.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“VERY DISAPOINTED. You lose time.”

📉 Evidence Quality

18/100

“VERY DISAPOINTED. You lose time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Experience

  • VERY DISAPOINTED. You lose time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • VERY DISAPOINTED. You lose time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one vague and , so the rating has low reliability.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1561 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values