AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Selina Klippenstein

MATH8140 · MATH127 · MATH123 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and and quizzes.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesFast pacingHeavy homeworkQuizzesMixed helpfulness
  • Three of four reviews are strongly negative about her teaching clarity.
  • Students report fast pacing, confusion, and .
  • One positive , but also mentions lots of homework and quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

Even when the class is not described as conceptually impossible, students report lots of , and hard work for low grades.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content feels harder because students describe fast pacing, confusion, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but reviews do not prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students would avoid her because , and poorly explained.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

One student reports working very hard for a C-, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The clearest workload comment says there is a lot of homework and quizzes.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most reviews describe her teaching as , and poorly explained despite one positive experience.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework and quizzes, but do .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with and fast pacing.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear teaching that makes math harder to learn.

What students said

“Makes NO sense 99% of the time.”
MATH127
“Had to work REALLY hard for a C-.”
MATH123
“Theres a lot of hw and quizzes.”
MATH123

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes but .

Quizzes MentionedReviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Quizzes MentionedReviews do not clearly prove exam format
“Theres a lot of hw and quizzes.”
MATH123

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Whips though material . Makes NO sense 99% of the time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Makes NO sense 99% of the time.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Theres a lot of hw and quizzes.”

⚖️ Grade Effort

31/100

“Had to work REALLY hard for a C-.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Selina really helped me with math.
  • Whips though material .
  • This teacher needs to learn how to teach students in a better way and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Theres a lot of hw and quizzes.
  • Had to work REALLY hard for a C-.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

56/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews show a strong negative pattern, but the sample is small and one review is sharply positive.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1232 reviews
MATH1271 review
MATH81401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values