AI Rate Professor

English

Richard Johnson

ENG1A · ENG1A1B · ENG7 · ENGLISH1A · 1B7 · ENGL7 · ENG1AB · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a strong English instructor whose fair workload and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspiring TeacherFair GraderClear ExpectationsHelpful and ApproachableWorth the Work
  • Students repeatedly describe him as inspiring, knowledgeable, and student-centered.
  • The class is not effortless, but students say the work is fair and useful.
  • , and many students strongly recommend taking him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A likely requires real writing effort, but and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The material is approachable because and keeps assignments meaningful, though it is still college English.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Reviews do not prove a , but students describe the class as valuable and enjoyable to attend.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes English feel worthwhile.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Students describe him as a or harsh grader.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Assignments are described as meaningful and not overbearing, though the class still requires effort.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students consistently describe him as inspiring, knowledgeable, helpful, and able to make English engaging.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize writing, assignments, short stories, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing inspiration, fairness, helpfulness, and engaging English instruction.

Main concern

The main caution is that the course still requires real college-level work.

What students said

“Hard work but .”
ENG1A
“ . A ”
ENG1A1B
“He encouraged me to pursue writing and helped me find confidence/voice that i didn't have.”
ENG1AB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention excellent exam preparation but .

Exam Prep MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

is strong, not the exact exam policy.

Exam Prep Mentioned
“ .”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“He made learning English and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“IF !”

⚖️

72/100

“He makes the assigments and , and then grades on the goals set.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher was such an inspiration to me.
  • He really listened and showed interest in what i thought.
  • Very helpful and tries to keep things interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard work but .
  • .
  • A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Never puts anyone down for any reason.
  • and empathetic to his students needs.
  • A truly lovely and knowledgeable individual.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews show strong consistency, but they are old and lack recent detail.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A4 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
1B71 review
ENG1A1B1 review
ENG1AB1 review
Show 2 more courses
ENG71 review
ENGL71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values