AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Melinda Jones

FMST18 · FAMST14 · HMSEX218 · FMST205 · FAMST18 · FAM214 · FMST218 · GRNT101 · FMST212 · FS18 · HUMANSEXUALITY · FAMSTU18 · FAMST · FMST214 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if grade fairness matters most, but consider her only if you care more about the subject than the .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderInteresting MaterialUnclear ExpectationsHard TestsPolarizing Personality
  • Older positive reviews praise her personality and interesting classes, but .
  • Written responses, essays, and because .
  • The course may be interesting, but the grade risk is high for students who need predictable evaluation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

Getting an A appears difficult because tests and written responses are often graded strictly and unpredictably.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The material can be interesting, but the amount of information, tricky tests, and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews , but in-person participation appears useful for understanding expectations.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Many students warn against taking her because and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Multiple reviews describe failing grades on written work, extreme scrutiny, and grades that feel unfair or inconsistent.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload is driven , and a large amount of information to know.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Positive reviews praise her knowledge and energy, but , and unapproachability.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and exams rather than relying on one single format.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe interesting material and caring moments, but many students , and difficult tests.

Main concern

The main concern is strict and and tests.

What students said

“Most of the class failed.”
FMST218
“SHE IS VERY SMART, VERY FUNNY AND A VERY COOL TEACHER.”
FAMST
“There is so much effing information to know it's rediculous”
FMST214

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and written responses are student-unfriendly because students repeatedly report hard tests and proctoring rules.

Difficult TestsWritten Response TestsFill In The Blank TestsTricky Multiple ChoiceStrict Short Answer Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention difficult fill-in-the-blank, multiple-choice, and written response tests, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

Difficult TestsWritten Response TestsFill In The Blank TestsTricky Multiple ChoiceStrict Short Answer Grading
“You will think that you got an A on a and end up with an F.”
HMSEX218
“ the blank”
FAM214
“ but for !”
FAMSTU18

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will think that you got an A on a and end up with an F.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

18/100

“She is a , as many have stated before me, you'll write a solid paper and receive a failing grade.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She mixes in a lot of hands on activiteis and makes the class interesting.”

📚

28/100

“ the blank and often times hard to figure out even if you do know the material.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • She grades her short answers with unbelievable scrutiny.
  • . totally unfair grader when it comes to written responses.
  • The grades seem to change per person even if they're the same quality work.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She knows her subject matter.
  • She always found a way to keep me awake even though I had her for a night class.
  • She is very unapproachable.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty And Tests

  • Most of the class failed.
  • but for !
  • There is so much effing information to know it's rediculous

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 17 in-person reviews with detailed and , and teaching style.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

FMST2142 reviews
GRNT1012 reviews
HUMANSEXUALITY2 reviews
FAM2141 review
FAMST1 review
Show 9 more courses
FAMST141 review
FAMST181 review
FAMSTU181 review
FMST181 review
FMST2051 review
FMST2121 review
FMST2181 review
FS181 review
HMSEX2181 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values