AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Timothy Becher

ARCH221 · ARCH222 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can learn independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent gradingScattered lecturesFlexible deadlinesIndustry experienceWeak structure
  • Students describe him as nice and knowledgeable but ineffective as a teacher.
  • Major concerns include inconsistent grading, forgotten instructions, and scattered class time.
  • The course may be flexible, but students question whether it builds useful architecture skills.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

The work may be flexible, but unclear and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content itself does not sound very hard, but .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

Students describe him as flexible and willing to work with them, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because class structure, lectures, and .

All and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students criticize grading as inconsistent and not clearly based on submitted work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

and sometimes completed during class, but the low workload did not feel valuable.

Format shift

All workload comments are from in-person classes.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students say he has field knowledge but is scattered, forgetful, and not effective in the classroom.

Format shift

, and the teaching concerns are consistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on assignments, portfolios, and submitted work rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a flexible and experienced and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly report inconsistent grading, forgotten directions, and poor class structure.

What students said

“ as a person not based on your work.”
ARCH221
“Scattered and his train of thoughts.”
ARCH222
“ and gives good ideas, yet I dont think hes up to par with the realm of teaching.”
ARCH222

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Scattered and his train of thoughts.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course value. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ and gives good ideas, yet I dont think hes up to par with the realm of teaching.”

⚖️

25/100

“ as a person not based on your work.”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“Sorry if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Scattered and his train of thoughts.
  • We would come to class somedays with nothing to do.
  • He has a wealth of information in this feild.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • as a person not based on your work.
  • He is also an .
  • Can't always trust what he tells you because he will change his mind

Theme 3

📚 About Class Value

  • My portfolio didn't really gain much from this class either.
  • This is perfect for an English class or something but not a class towards your future carrear.
  • Nice guy, but needs to retire.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are detailed and consistently describe disorganization and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ARCH2212 reviews
ARCH2222 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values