AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Matt Michaelis

PHIL206 · PHILINTR · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if and slower lectures for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardNice and understandingLenient gradingReading heavyBoring lectures
  • Students describe him as kind and understanding.
  • An A is realistic if students keep up with the reading.
  • The main drawback is boring, note-heavy class time with a lot of reading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A and effort because as nice and lenient.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The philosophy content can be hard and reading-heavy, but .

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Students recommend him mainly because , and fair with grading.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Students say and that an A is achievable with the reading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload is reading-heavy even though the .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

He is described as nice and understanding, but one review says class time is boring and note-heavy.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize readings, notes, and discussion rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a but and sometimes boring lectures.

Main concern

Class can feel boring and reading-heavy.

What students said

“do the , but it's a LOT of reading.”
PHILINTR
“His class is hard but .”
PHIL206

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or book policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His class is hard but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He is a very nice, understanding teacher.”

⚖️

80/100

“His class is hard but .”

📚 Workload

35/100

“do the , but it's a LOT of reading.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's a nice guy, but his class is pretty boring.
  • He is a very nice, understanding teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • do the , but it's a LOT of reading.
  • His class is hard but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so patterns are useful but limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL2061 review
PHILINTR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values