AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Mary MacCorkle

JOUR1B · JOUR201A · JOURNALISMAB · JOURAANDB · JOURN1A · JOURN · JOUR1AJOUR1B · JOURNALISM · JOUR201 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Take Mary MacCorkle mainly for an easy grade, not for a consistently strong or .

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery Easy ADisorganized LecturesPolarizing PersonalityWriting-FocusedLenient Curve
  • Students widely agree the class is easy to pass or ace if you do the work.
  • Teaching quality is highly inconsistent, with many complaints about rambling, poor organization, and limited usefulness.
  • Students who already write well or take journalism seriously may benefit more than beginners.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A appears easy for students who attend, complete the few projects, and stay on her good side, with some reviews noting a .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The course content is repeatedly described as easy and common sense, though it may not teach much to students needing structure.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance seems practically important for staying favored and on track, but reviews do not clearly show a .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students recommend her only if you want an easy grade or already care about writing, because many found the teaching poor and disorganized.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Several reviews say students can get an A by doing the work, and one notes a .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

Workload sounds light, with only a and repeated claims that the class is easy.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Reviews are split, but repeated complaints about rambling, disorganization, and unhelpful lectures outweigh the positive comments about her experience and kindness.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews mention tests, projects, writing work, and a book report, so assessment .

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but polarizing journalism class with scattered teaching and personality-dependent outcomes.

Main concern

Many students say and .

What students said

“It's EASY to ace this class.”
JOUR1AJOUR1B
“her lectures had nothing to due with anything”
JOUR201A
“Show that you want to improve and you'll get an A.”
JOUR201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention easy tests and a curve, but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Tests MentionedCurve MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention easy tests and a curve, but .

Easy TestsCurve Mentioned
“She has a ”
JOUR1B
“ SO easy.”
JOUR1AJOUR1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's EASY to ace this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“She rambles a lot, she is very unhelpful.”

📈 Easy Grade

86/100

“Show that you want to improve and you'll get an A.”

⚖️

82/100

“She has a , so even if you do bad you still get an a.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures had nothing to due with anything
  • She rambles a lot, she is very unhelpful.
  • there is NO orginization to the class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's EASY to ace this class.
  • just be a good student, and you'll pass.
  • if you want to do the very few rediculous projects that she makes you do then you will probably get an A in the class

Theme 3

❤️ About Fit

  • She helped me hone my writing ability into what it is today.
  • .
  • She is the sweetest lady IF she likes you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 14 in-person reviews over several years show a consistent pattern of but disputed teaching quality.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

JOUR201A3 reviews
JOUR1B2 reviews
JOUR2012 reviews
JOURN1A2 reviews
JOUR1AJOUR1B1 review
Show 4 more courses
JOURAANDB1 review
JOURN1 review
JOURNALISM1 review
JOURNALISMAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values